20th March 2015 – Malcolm Fraser, 84
("MalcolmFraser1982" by Camera Operator: A1C MONTGOMERY. Licensed under Public Domain via Commons.)
Prime Minister of Australia from 1975 to
1983, and the beneficiary of Sir John Kerr’s move on Gough Whitlam. Whitlam and
Fraser were sworn enemies, though they became friends later in life.
“Malcolm Fraser's decision in 1975 to block
Australian Prime Minister Gough Whitlam's budget was the ultimate in
brinkmanship. It eventually delivered him the prime ministership. And, although
he won three general elections in a row, the dismissal of the Whitlam
government that followed the budget impasse haunted Fraser for the rest of his
life and overshadowed his political achievements. During his prime ministership
between 1975 and 1983, Fraser was considered patrician, aloof and arrogant,
even by some of his supporters. Dubbed the "crazy grazier" by the
media and an "Easter Island statue" by Labor opponent and future
Labor prime minister Paul Keating, Fraser was a study in contradictions. He was
an economic conservative but a modest social reformer; a Cold War warrior and a
fierce opponent of apartheid; a traditionalist with a social conscience he only
gave full rein to in his later years.”
Wendy Frew, BBC obit
Wendy Frew, BBC obit
“From his first days in politics, Mr Fraser
was an advocate of immigration as a means of boosting the population.As a
minister in the Gorton government, he became the first federal politician to
use the word "multiculturalism" — an historic break from the
Anglocentric past of his own party.Mr Fraser's multicultural conviction found
shape in immigration policy in the post-Vietnam war push to bring refugees from
mainland South East Asia to Australia."I believe we had a moral and
ethical obligation," Mr Fraser later said. "If we had taken polls ...
I think people would have voted 80, 90 per cent against us but we explained the
reasons for it. We were also working to get people to understand that the idea
and the reality of a multicultural Australia could be an enormous strength to
this country, not a weakness. There is strength in this kind of diversity so
long as we understand what it's about."
Peter Lloyd, ABC obit
“Sir Robert Menzies indicated in earlier
discussions, going back I suppose 20 or 30 years, that he believed that the
whole system of apartheid was abhorrent and doomed to the most ghastly failure
because, in all its simplicity, the South Africans were saying that they would
give black Africans educational and economic equality but never, of course,
political equality. Therein is the certainly that apartheid must one day fail,
because the more people have educational or economic equality, the less will
they be prepared to accept or tolerate political inequality. Whatever view one
might have of the immorality of apartheid, logically, and on a straight
analysis of what apartheid is about, it is doomed to failure.”
Malcolm Fraser, 1982 speech
In 1975, as leader of the opposition,
Fraser had told his colleagues to block the Whitlam government budget,
believing it would lead to an early election that the Liberal party could win.
When Whitlam, to cut a long story short, went to the Governor General to talk
of a half-Senate election, Kerr decided to sack the Prime Minister instead and
replace him with the leader of the opposition.
“Well may we say "God save the
Queen", because nothing will save the Governor-General! The Proclamation
which you have just heard read by the Governor-General's Official Secretary was
countersigned Malcolm Fraser, who will undoubtedly go down in Australian
history from Remembrance Day 1975 as Kerr's cur. They won't silence the
outskirts of Parliament House, even if the inside has been silenced for a few
weeks ... Maintain your rage and enthusiasm for the campaign for the election
now to be held and until polling day.”
Gough Whitlam (who as you can imagine, was
quite calm about things)
However, for all the rage and protesting
the dismissal caused, by the time of the election in December 1975, Fraser’s
Liberals wound up with a 27 seat majority, as the election focused less on the
injustice and more on the economics of the time. [Whitlam had fallen into the
same PR trap in 3 years that Harold Wilson had in 6: being seen to be strong on
social issues but weak on finance.]
The Fraser government was all about the
financial bottom line and reducing the deficit, in clear parallels with the
modern Conservative party. Inflation, free trade and restraint were the buy
words. However, after 8 years of government, local issues – the Australian
drought of ’83 – meant the economy was in recession, as despite the frugality,
the government hadn’t stimulated the money supply.
“As Paul Kelly recounted in The End of
Certainty: "The economy-busting deal came in late 1981 in the metals
industry, with a collective bargaining agreement ratified by the full bench (of
the Arbitration Commission). It meant an average rise in hourly wages of 24 per
cent for 400,000 metalworkers or 9 per cent of the workforce. In 1982, wages
rose across the workforce by 16 per cent, with a resulting squeeze on
profits." The bonanza quickly became a disaster, both for the timid
government of Malcolm Fraser and for the unions, a point former ACTU secretary
Bill Kelty later conceded. About 100,000 jobs were lost in the metal trades
alone. Inflation and unemployment soared, with the jobless rate in 1983 rising
6.6 to 10.3 per cent. In 1986, Paul Keating blasted the AMWU for "carrying
100,000 unemployed dead men around its neck".In winning the 1983 election,
Bob Hawke campaigned on a promise of creating 500,000 jobs, a feat he
recognised would require vast modernisation of Australian workplaces and wages
policy. He secured union restraint through his early Accords, the forerunner of
more extensive IR reforms for the next 20 years. And the 500,000 jobs target
was reached by November 1985.”
“Heeding the lessons of the 1981 recession”,
The Australian, March 13 2009
Socially, Fraser’s government included the
first Aboriginal senator, and in 1976, they passed the Aboriginal Land Rights
Act. He was a multilateralist, and a multiculturalist.
“He backed legislation that gave Indigenous
people in the Northern Territory more control over their traditional lands. He
remained an unapologetic supporter of multiculturalism and set up the
government-funded national broadcaster SBS to provide multilingual services.
The immigration program was revitalised with a fresh focus on Asia. More than
2,000 boat people were granted entry under his watch.His real focus was on
foreign policy in the Asia-Pacific region and turbulent southern Africa.
Defence ties and trade relations were beefed up with Asia in an era when there
was still a fear of communism spreading. He formed close and productive ties
with African leaders in the campaign against apartheid, which in his case
stretched back to speeches he gave after the 1960 Sharpeville massacre. At that
time, in defiance of Menzies’ view that apartheid was an internal matter,
Fraser argued for international action against South Africa because of “the
great principle of human rights, that all men are born equal and have an
inalienable right to their place in the sun, no matter what their colour, race
or creed”. He opposed white minority rule in what was then Rhodesia and backed
Robert Mugabe to head an independent Zimbabwe.”
Christopher Zinn, Guardian obit
Christopher Zinn, Guardian obit
“The international community ought to do
much more. We have had a refugee intake of around 12,000, that is an official
intake. Amongst official intakes worldwide, that is relatively high. But if you
want to make an honest judgement about what a country does, you look at the
official and the unofficial intake. Some time ago, in the 90s, Australia made a
decision to reduce the official intake by the number of boat people who came
here. So there was a cap of about 14,000 on humanitarian intake overall... If
we were genuine in having a real humanitarian view of these issues, we would
again join with other countries that are far more generous than we are like
America, Canada, the Nordic countries and argue for all recipient countries to
take more refugees out of UNHCR camps and we would also argue for more countries
to become recipient countries and try and reduce those numbers.”
Malcolm Fraser, The Conversation 2011
(disclaimer – I’ve removed a large piece explaining how governments fudge the
figures for length and meander reasons)
Fraser became a critic of his own party in
later life, criticizing the policies of John Howard (whom Fraser had given his
first break in government 30 years previously). Later, when Tony Abbott became
leader of the Liberal party, Malcolm Fraser left the party entirely.
“A FEW days after Malcolm Fraser delivered
his most recent - and most damning - critique of the Howard Government, he rang
Gough Whitlam to discuss the reason for his attack: the counter-terrorism laws
that were introduced this week. In a neat coincidence, Whitlam informed his old
adversary that he had spoken out on the same issue that very morning, and made
arrangements to fax a front-page report on his comments in The Sydney Morning
Herald to Fraser's Melbourne office. Three decades ago, they were on opposite
sides in the nation's gravest constitutional and political crisis. Today, when
it comes to the biggest issues facing the nation and the planet, they are two
grumpy old men, generally in furious agreement."In today's world, there's
more we have in common than there would be that divides us," says Fraser,
now 75. "And certainly, so far as our personal relationship is concerned,
whatever happened in the past has passed. "That's the strong impression he
has given me for a long while - and it's certainly what I've felt in relation
to him." And what about Whitlam, who will celebrate his 90th birthday next
July? "I've said on many occasions that I find it difficult to think of
any matter in foreign affairs where I don't agree with the views he expresses
these days," he says.”
Michael Gordon, Sydney Morning Herald, 2005
“I think the whole party is very much on
the extreme right. I happen to believe that the Minchin/Abbott duo to get rid
of Malcolm Turnbull – who had actually won a couple of party room votes, even
though narrowly – but then they said we’re not going to work with you anyway,
we’ll walk out. The minority was saying we won’t accept the majority and the
majority just accepted it. It was an extraordinary occurrence and I believe
that rather than being on the emissions trading scheme, it was because Malcolm
was showing some significant signs of being a liberal and they didn’t want a
liberal in charge of the Liberal party, they wanted a conservative in charge of
the Liberal party.”
Malcolm Fraser, The Conversation 2011
His reputation, on the left, tends to swing
on John Kerr. Had he naturally beaten Whitlam in an election without the coup
(as he almost certainly would, have done it handily after!) then there would
been far less recriminations. Whilst his coming to office was dubious in the
manner, and his focus on the economics the bastion of the centre-right, his
social policies (including extra funding of the Arts, and his unflinching
stance on immigration) were highly approving, and Australian politics would be
in a far better place if it had Liberal leaders more in the Fraser mold.
When Gough Whitlam died last year, an
expert in the field’s view to me was, basically, “F*** John Kerr”. When Fraser
died, another expert in the field’s view to me was, basically, “F*** John
Kerr”. On that, it seems, everyone can agree who the bogeyman was.
The trouble for Australia is not that
Fraser beat Whitlam through chicanery first, or that Kerr helped to propagate
any stab in the back mythologizing. The trouble is that what it needed to do,
as a country, was take the best ideas of Gough Whitlam AND Malcolm Fraser in
going forward. Mix them together and you have a damn fine political legacy.
The trouble is not that which side to pick.
The trouble is that modern Australian governments have moved away from both.
No comments:
Post a Comment