Tuesday, 5 June 2012

Euro 2012 roundtables #4: Group C preview





Euro 2012 Roundtable #4

Group C Preview





Group C




Ah, a group with, in no particular order:



My picks to win the tournament.

Two perennial underdog who likes to pick off larger nations.

The greatest side in the world. TM.

The winners of the last two World Cups.

Michael’s favourite current player. Bar none.

The land of my ancestors. Who are also Gavin’s least favourite team in the tournament.

Some leaky defences, Richard Dunne, and some top class finishers. Balotelli, Jelavic, Llorente, Cox, the names just roll off your tongue.



All things considered, this may be a contender for best group of the tournament.



But will it live up to expectations or be a damp squid?



Not that I’ve seen many squids that weren’t damp. Squid tend to be damp, on the whole. A dry squid is no good at all for the squid in question, really. They like living in the ocean, so they can live, and last I checked, oceans tend to be, ever so slightly, damp. Unless you are in the Sahara Ocean, which is quite deserted.



Where was I?



Oh yes...



Thoughts on Italy?


Michael: When people look at Italy, they tend to see a dull, ultra defensive side who are cynical and sit on 1-0 leads. The term catenaccio is thrown around with great aplomb. Its a national stereotype which ignores the fact that many of the more successful Italian sides – 1982 for example – were as good at attacking as they were defending. As much as Italy is reknowned for producing a conveyer belt of top class defenders, it is their seemingly endless supply of quality midfielders that attracts me. Their fantistas, capable of winning matches on their own. Their dogged defensive midfielders, with so determination. Their playmakers, often deep-lying, who can control any game, and see the winning pass five passes before it is required.



Of the latter, the Italian sides current, Andrea Pirlo, is unabashedly my favourite player currently active in football. On his day, he is the greatest player in the world and utterly unplayable. He is often looked over for big awards, as he is an unshowy performer except for rare occasions. AC Milan thought he was over the hill and so binned him in 2011. He then moved to Juventus, where he was pivotal in their undefeated title winning season. Thirty three, and still strong, if he turns it on, Italy will be a team hard to beat.



With the lack of a proper Robert Baggio, Pirlo will be in that role too.



I like the coach Prandelli, he has said all the intelligent things. This is a warm up tournament for the World Cup, it is a tournament too early for his players. He shields them from the media. He was quick to give Mario Balotelli a complete vote of confidence, announcing soon after his Arsenal sending off he was almost certain to make the Italian squad. He also announced he would argue to the death any pundit who tried to argue against some of his more controversial picks, like Di Natale, who was seen as past it. Prandelli has shown remarkable man management skills at the top level, and though his squad are buffeted by the scandals of home, they have a strong figure who seems adept at accentuating the positive in each player. He also likes to play in a more attacking spirit, which is also welcome!



Italy usually bring classic matches. In 2002, they had memorable ties with Croatia and of course South Korea. In 2004, their existence created one! In 2006, the USA match was memorable, as well as the German semifinal. In 2008, the Dutch game. In 2010, they were involved in three good games, but went home having won none of them. Then there was the Australian game in 2006, seemingly not controversial for the Materazzi’s unfair red card, and more for a completely just penalty awarded in the dying moments. Even Sepp Blatter came out and denounced it, showing not only does Sepp say anything that will give him political back up in a key area, but also that hes rubbish as a football pundit. It was quite clear at the time and remains so: Bresciano catches Grosso off balance, he goes into the box, Lucas Neill dives down to the ground for no good reason (anything that can dispossess the ball, bar his elbow, he’s managed to block out of the way) and as Grosso was trying to get around him, he falls. The slight issue where Neills arm was in front of Grosso and suddenly behind his leg right as Grosso lost control of the ball was a bit dodgy for the Australians at the very least. Foolish move, and really people should concentrate more on how Australia couldn’t beat Italy with superior numbers for forty minutes and then felt the need for the old hacky moves.



You can at least expect the Italians to be memorable.



And with more match fixing scandals in Serie A, its them vs the world.



And history shows how well that often works out...






Jon: It’s all gone a bit chaotic with their preparations – first there was the injury to Giuseppe Rossi which ruled him out, then there was the emergence of another match-fixing scandal (which led to Dominic Criscito being ruled out), then their friendly against Luxembourg was cancelled thanks to an earthquake and finally they’ve lost 3-0 to Russia in a very Italian performance (fabulous going forward, dodgy at the back). And of course there’s the most unpredictable element of all, Mario Balotelli, more of whom later. Those of us who’ve grown up watching Italy at international tournaments might find it strange that we’re expecting a more adventurous Italian side than normal, with the likes of Giovinco, Cassano and the old master himself Pirlo. Unlike the other nations we expect to see in the later reaches of tournaments – Germany, the Dutch and Spain - this approach is untested for them at tournament level. I expect it to ultimately be a tournament too early for them, but they should be entertaining while they’re about.








Gav: They are tying with Russia on my insular rating – 3 players play outside of Italy. Which means, I have to ask the question, will they have a squad once all this match fixing dust settles?





Michael: Probably not. Del Piero and Maldini are warming up just to be on the safe side. Though to be fair, Del Piero and Maldini could probably still destroy the current Ireland team. Class is permanent.





Dave Beattie: Thoughts on Italy? I'm a bit worried about Italy. They are usually the team I love to hate when it comes to major international tournaments. But I really liked Prandelli as a club coach & if World Soccer's description of their tactics as "more attack oriented than some previous Italian teams" is accurate then I might be forced to turn my ire elsewhere.





Michael: Portugal? (Poor Torn, he’ll be wondering why everyone has such a downer on the Portuguese)





Keld, Denmark: The defence and midfield look solid and based on the Serie A champions Juventus. The big question mark is up front, where much seems to be in the hands of the enigmas Balotelli and Cassano. The latter only just returned after heart problems kept him out for the main part of the season.






Joao Diogo Reis: Italy had a shameful 2010 World Cup – two draws against Paraguay and New Zealand, and the ultimate humiliation, defeated by Slovakia. They were also eliminated in the group stage in the 2009 Confederations Cup, with one win against the USA and two defeats against Egypt and Brazil.
It’s a dark era for Italian football, and I don’t think it is over yet. 


Half of the squad doesn’t have experience at major tournaments. Some who were just in the 2010 WC squad would rather have not been there; it hasn’t enhanced anyone’s reputation.


 
One of the interesting things about Italy will be their unique tactic. While everybody will be using 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 or 4-4-2, Italy will use a 4-3-1-2. Italian club teams are the ones who try to innovate in the Champions League and Europa League: Napoli and Udinese played with a back three, while Inter started the season with a 3-4-3 project but was quickly abandoned. 


Italy’s first game will be against their last opponent in the Euro Cups: Spain, who eliminated them in the 2008 quarter finals. While the 2008 game was supposed to be “balanced” (Italy was the recent World Champion, and Spain hadn’t its Euro and World crowns yet), this one isn’t. Italy’s fight should be with Croatia for the second spot, not with Spain for winning the tournament.






Thoughts on Spain?



Michael: No bad.





Jon: What do you say about the Spanish that hasn’t been said already? ‘They’re crap’. Back in the real world, what do you say? That they’re the natural conclusion to the mantra about possession being nine tenths of the law? That their technical perfection can be sterile, particularly when other teams attempt to counter it by parking the bus? That they’re unquestionably one of the finest national sides of all time, matching the achievement of Zidane’s France in being both World and European champions? All of that. And then to keep their feet on the floor you remind them that no national side has ever won three straight major tournaments before. In a technical battle they will best any side, the biggest threat to them before the tournament centres on how they cope with the absences of both their most reliable goalscorer David Villa and the hugely influential Carlos Puyol and whether all the games played by the Barça and Real Madrid players who provide the bulk of their side might catch up on them.





Michael: They’ve only got Casillas, Pique, Iniesta, Pedro, Xavi, Torres, Llorente, Fabregas, Mata, Xabi Alonso, Alba, Ramos, Busquets, Cazorla, Silva, Martinez. So once you take away those seventeen players, they’re quite ordinary, really. Apart from the subs. And the people who didn’t make the squad. And their kids. But apart from that...







Gav: I’ve seen a lot of lovely football in Spain this season, but I do find myself wondering – can they do it without Lionel Messi? I don’t think Torres is as good, but fortunately they have Llorente (the good Fernando Torres).



They have a class squad, really, don’t they?







Dave Beattie: Thoughts on Spain? Have to be favourites for the tournament but Switzerland showed in 2010 that they can be beaten. So did Chelsea in a way - if you assume Barca are at least as good as Spain... That said their squad depth looks frightening. How many other countries wouldn't have found room for a talent like Muniain in their 23? I love to watch them play & I've rooted for Spain in major tournaments for years but I like my football more unpredictable than "the favourites win" - so I hope either someone stops them or if they can't stop them they at least make them exceed everything they've done before to win in style.





Joao Diogo Reis: Spain is the best team of the World.
They won 14 competitive games in a row (a world record): 6 2010 World Cup games plus the 8 Euro 2012 qualifiers.
And future is bright: not only they are the European and World Champions, they are also the under-21 European Champions. There’s a new generation ready to replace this one.
Vicente Del Bosque opted for the World Champions in this tournament: 19 of Spain’s 23 players were also in the World Cup squad. The exceptions are Capdevila, Marchena, Puyol and David Villa out, and Jordi Alba, Santi Cazorla, Juanfran and Negredo in.
Puyol and David Villa are injured – if not, they’d surely be in this squad too.
Replacing these two will be Spain’s “problem”: Javi Martínez as central defender, just like he did for Athletic Bilbao this season? Or Sergio Ramos as central defender just like he did for Real Madrid with Arbeloa as right back? And who should be the striker, Fernando Torres, hero of the Euro 2008 final but without a single goal in the 2010 WC, or Llorente?
Spain is so good that even without Puyol and David Villa they look like the better team, their subs are better than the starters from most of the other teams, even the players who couldn’t get in the squad are some of Europe’s finest and will surely shine in future tournaments (De Gea, Thiago Alcântara, Muniain, Adrián López, etc.)






Keld, Denmark: Del Bosque will probably not deviate from his World Cup winning formula, so he will wear both belt (Busquets) and braces (Xabi Alonso). This is probably necessary as Puyol is absent and the Shakira-ridden Pique has struggled all season. Javi Martinez or Sergio Ramos will be called upon to close the gap of Puyol. The squad is a plethora of midfield stars, but there are problems up front. David Villa, who scored the necessary goals in 2010, is gone, and Fernando Torres is well, you all know . I don’t see Llorente or Negredo starting all games, so I think del Bosque will go with David Silva in the famous “false 9” role. He was terrific when tried in that role against Scotland, but that’s not really much of a test, is it?





Michael: They’re no bad. Still think calling up Negredo over Adrian was an error though, Olympics or no Olympics. Nothing quite like looking on the bright side of life, eh?





Thoughts on the Irish? (Gavin might want to skip this question, ahem)




Gav: What the ... *lots of beeping* ... do they think ... *lots more beeping* ... Hungarian refereeing ... *even more expletives* ... to Estonia!





Joao Diogo Reis: Ireland is one of the weakest Euro 2012 teams (alongside the co-hosts Poland and Ukraine). 



The last time that they qualified for a major tournament was 10 years ago. They still keep 4 players from that squad: goalkeeper Given, defender Dunne, midfielder Duff and forward Robbie Keane. 


Although they are “supposed to” be eliminated in the group stages, perhaps even lose the 3 games, history says that Ireland was always competitive in final tournaments (4 points in Euro 1988, World Cup quarter finalists in 1990 with 4 draws and 1 defeat, against… Italy, 4 points again in the 1994 WC, and finally 5 points in 2002, progressed from its group, and then eliminated in the last 16 round in a penalty shootout by… Spain). 


Everybody remembers the way that Ireland missed the 2010 World Cup; it would have been interesting if they were in France’s group. Perhaps they can still meet later in the tournament, but I doubt it.





Keld, Denmark: Well their material fits well to their role as an underdog, and they will be a hard nut to crack for the opponents. A hard-working side with Kevin Doyle to aim for up-front. The pacy wingers could cause many teams problems on the break, and maybe Robbie Keane can pull off a trick or two before probably retiring.





Dave Beattie: Thoughts on the Irish? (Gavin might want to skip this question, ahem) When I think of football & Ireland I immediately think of Gerry Armstrong in 1982 (I know wrong country) & Ray Houghton in 1994. Italy & Spain... Now with an Italian coach with a more traditionally Italian style than the Italians themselves I hope they can give me something to cheer about. I guess the experienced spine of Given, Dunne & Keane - plus possibly Duff out wide - will be key.





Jon: Royally screwed. Arguably Trapattoni has already got them punching well above their weight just by getting them to the tournament – even Jack Charlton could call on players from England’s top clubs, . Trap’s introduced Italian style defensive steel but maintained the grand Jackie Charlton tradition of long balls and set pieces. It’s a formula which has worked well enough to take them to the verge of the last World Cup before Henry’s infamous handball led to the French pipping them and got them here behind a good Russia side. They won’t concede too many but it’s tough to see them posing the scoring threat they’ll need.





Michael: “ Made a note in my diary on the way here. Simply says... "Bugger". Darling, Blackadder Goes Forth.



Can’t think why that comes to mind.



Ireland (in this case the Republic) have made a habit of turning bad draws into success stories. In 1988, they were drawn against Holland, the crack USSR, and some side called England. They nearly qualified for the Semis. In 1990, they managed to get to the World Cup Quarterfinals, though I’m not sure anyone quite knows how, least of all Jack Charlton or David O’Leary. In 1994, they took on Roberto Baggios Italy and won, and managed to get to the last sixteen despite a fiery clash with Mexico. In 2002, Roy Keane happened just before they kicked off, and despite being over played in both matches, Ireland still managed to sneak draws against Cameroon and Germany. I like David Bennie’s comment in Soccer Samurai that the moment when Geremi scuffed his open chance for 2-0 in the Cameroon/Ireland tie, that he was surprised ITV didn’t flash up “PIVOTAL MOMENT” on the screen!



Bennie also suggests that the Mick McCarthy/Roy Keane fall out transpired in the following way:



“McCarthy: I am the Irish coach and therefore above grammar.

Keane: An Irish gentleman need not know Gaelic, but he should at least have forgotten it.”




It’s a great book, I strongly suggest it if you ever see it on Amazon. Gets read as often as the Glanville, and my rather tattered copy of Bill Leckie’s Penthouses and Pavements.



Where was I?



Oh yes, despite everything, it come down to a penalty shootout against Spain in 2002, where the Irish could claim they were a bit unlucky, certainly.



Unlucky wasn’t the half of it, as they proceeded not to qualify for any tournament between then and now. Unlucky certainly in 2004. A bad start – thumped by Russia – saw them recover to take 2nd late in the group, only to lose to Switzerland and see the Russians, who had managed to lose to Georgia (not a match you will see in the near future), somehow sneak into the playoff spot, and sneak to the Euros after dispatching a gutsy Wales. Ireland’s 2004 performances – a competitive draw in France, a friendly win over Holland – suggested they were one of the best sides to miss out on the 2004 Euros. They looked good for a place at the World Cup though, and were in a friendly enough group. Over cautious management tactics (which I feel is a kind enough euphemism) meant a group Ireland could have grabbed by the throat they instead allowed to become a four way dance, and in the final showdown, the French regrouped to win in Dublin, and the Irish were home. After looking favourites for so long, they finished fourth. It was truly an example of finding defeat in the jaws of victory.



In qualifying for 2008, they were, not very good. They did manage to finish 3rd in the group, but ten points behind the Germans, and never looked in the qualifying fight. They were undefeated at home, but that record including a 1-1 draw with Cyprus to compliment their 5-2 thrashing away.



Then came Trappatoni, and things began to change. They finished behind the Italians in the qualifying for the 2010 World Cup, and so a playoff beckoned. Against France. And we all know of the Hand of Thierry which saw the French qualify at the expense of the Irish. Two years on, and the Irish qualified, despite the Estonians feeling aggrieved. If history repeats itself, Estonia are going to the World Cup.



I have a great fear Ireland are going to get thumped to bits in this group. Whelan and Andrews going up against Iniesta and Xavi is the stuff of nightmares. They actually have some talented players, but its a tournament too late for most, and a tournament too soon for others. So thumped is my general feeling.






Thoughts on Croatia?




Michael: Dad hates Croatia. He’s probably reading this right about now. Hi Dad! Bet he never thought I’d be organising this sort of thing after seeing Gala Fairydean v Arthurlie as a child.



It is true that Croatia have had a cynical nature to their football which shows up in unsavoury moments. The infamous Australian match in 2006 wasn’t even an eyeopener to it, as Bilic himself in 1998 simulated to get Laurent Blanc sent off in the World Cup semifinal!



What makes this even sadder is that when they put their heads down, they play some lovely stuff. They blew Germany off the pitch in 2008. They were undone in the Quarters by the comeback kings, Turkey, and followed that up by a home and away thumping by England which prevented them qualifying for the 2010 World Cup. In 2006 and 2004, they were considered dark horses, and went out very quickly. I’ve actually only seen them qualify from the group stage once, and they needed to narrowly beat terrible Austria and Poland to do it. The omens don’t seem good for them here.



That said, Croatia did well in 2008, without any strikers. This time they have Jelavic, Mandzukic and Eduardo. They could be problematic. But then, could is one of the harshest words in the English language.




Jon: Bilic believes they can win the tournament, the bookies disagree. Their 4-4-2 tactics look a tad old-fashioned in a tournament of 4-2-3-1 and 4-3-3 but still they’re officially amongst the ten best teams in the world. If Italy can be caught out as their defeat to Russia suggests then Eduardo and the in-form Jelavic are ideally suited to do so, but then they may well fall apart against the well organised Irish side.






Keld, Denmark: A quite experienced side with several players in their best footballing age. Schildenfeld and Simunic in the central defence are not of great quality, so the midfield four will be expected to help out massively in defence. The relentless pressure from Olic and Mandžukić up front will frustrate opponents, but in order to be dangerous they will need good services from Srna and Rakitić on the wings.





Dave Beattie: Thoughts on Croatia? They still have one of my favourite players in Modric but otherwise they seem to be a pale shadow of the team I loved watching four years ago. See them as more likely to be 4th than 2nd in the group but wouldn't mind seeing them prove me wrong - if only for outgoing coach Slaven Bilic who will surely be coaching in the Premier League sometime soon. 



 

Gav: They have a pretty strong squad, and without having to play against the double pairing of Theo Walcot and Emile Heskey they should get far. Maybe not the ideal group for them though. It might be tough for them but I suspect they might finish 2nd in this group.





Joao Diogo Reis: Croatia is the most successful ex-Yugoslavia country.
4 years ago they won their 3 games in Euro 2008 group stage, and then were eliminated by Turkey in quarter finals, in a penalty shootout.
They already had their revenge in Euro 2012 qualifiers – they qualified eliminating Turkey in playoffs, with an overwhelming 3-0 win in Turkey.
They kept most of the important players from Euro 2008. Only the Kovac brothers Robert and Niko retired.
They also have many players (13) who never played at a major tournament, including Eduardo (Croatia’s top scorer in Euro 2008 qualifiers, who broke a leg in February 2008 and was injured for 1 year, thus missing the tournament).
They have a “perfect” calendar: they start with Ireland (the easiest), then face Italy (probably already with a 3 points advantage), and end the group stage against Spain (probably already qualified after the second game).





Balotelli - saint or sinner?




Michael: Ah, Balotelli, what a mercurial nutter he is. Capable of greatness and stupidity often in the same game. His heart seems in the right place, though he was the immaturity of a child never allowed to grow up, and his head often gets lost. I can’t help but like the boy though, and chose to personally believe nearly every one of the incredible Balotelli myths that have sprung up in Manchester. After all, when questioned about one of the more outlandish ones (Mario dressing up as Santa to hand out cash to disadvantaged kids, as first heard on Twitter), Roberto Mancini said: “It’s something I could believe Mario would do.” That’s good enough for me then! As for the Euros, he’ll be a Saint. The chance to be saviour for a nation is a temptation too strong for him to do anything else surely.




Jon: He has a devil on one shoulder and an angel on the other and you never know which one he’s going to listen to. Combine that with arrogance born of flamboyant talent and you have a player who will entertain as genius or pantomime villain, rarely are there any half measures. I wouldn’t change a thing, but I’d hate to be managing him.






Dave Beattie: Ballotelli - saint or sinner? Ballotelli AND Cassano in the same dressing room. Volatile. Much.





Gav: He’s apparently a very gifted footballer. All I’ve seen him do is gift games to the opposition. As the ITV pundits will no doubt ask you CONSTANTLY – which Ballotelli will turn up?




Keld, Denmark: He will start as the undisputed first choice up front, and I think he will be saint. Italy surely needs him to be.





Joao Diogo Reis: I can find a lot of adjectives starting with an s for Balotelli: stupid, spontaneous, spoiled, silly, skilled, superfluous, etc.





Players to watch out for?



Jon: (Michael drums fingers and narrows eyes, writer takes note) Ignoring Pirlo would be a real mistake. In a fine career, orchestrating Juve’s unbeaten season over the past nine months may be his finest achievement yet. Cassano and Giovinco but above all no-one will be able to take their eyes off Balotelli – you can believe he might actually carry out his threat to kill any racists from the stands. For Croatia it has to be their mastermind Luka Modric whose ability to control games is frankly wasted in the Premier League – there’s a very good reason Roman Abramovich was willing to pay £40 million for his services. The Irish will largely be reliant on their defence, so key for them is likely to be Richard Dunne who’s just back from an injury layoff. As for Spain – well do you really need me to mention every single midfielder they’ve got? With the Spanish the interest lies with who’ll start up front for them.





Michael: Giovinco is highly rated by Prandelli, and Borini by the Italian media, so they should be interesting to see. Have Italy ever taken five strikers to a tournament before? Attack minded Prandelli is a big favourite here. Simon Cox is actually quite a talent so it will be interesting to see him at the highest level if he gets much game time for Ireland. I picked up Mandzukic as a talent to watch way back in 2008, so to ignore him now would be churlish. And finally, Cazorla. He gets forgotten, in fact, some pundits were even saying he should get axed! But he provides an asset for Spain in midfield, and in a team with so many world class midfielders, that is saying something!





Gav: Everyone from the Spain squad.





Dave Beattie: Spain - Everybody knows Spain already and Xavi & Iniesta are two of the best players in the world to watch - even without Messi. After watching Athletic Bilbao this season I'm interested to see what Llorente can do in front of goal for the national team. With Villa out & Torres in questionable - if improving - form - he might well get that chance.


Italy - I was looking forward to seeing Claudio Marchisio in South Africa & he didn't too much. Anonymous sources (wikipedia - cough) tell me he played out of position then so I'm giving him a second chance. If Italy do well AND force me to like them he's the kind of player who will have a good tournament.

Croatia - Modric & maybe Jelavic. Interested to see how much playing time some of the younger players get too - particularly Ivan Perisic from German Champions Borussia Dortmund.





Joao Diogo Reis: Balotelli - everybody will be expecting something from him… not necessarily something good.
Jordi Alba – the “new guy” in Spain’s team. Capdevila wasn’t an outstanding player; he doesn’t have a big responsibility replacing him. Maybe he will team up with his former Valencia teammate David Silva in Spain’s left flank, making it more offensive than the right flank.
McGeady – the only Irish who doesn’t play in an English speaking country. Duff isn’t getting younger, now it’s up to him to get Ireland forward and catch opponents unbalanced.
Eduardo – 4 years ago he missed the Euro that he deserved to play; now he finally gets his chance.





Keld, Denmark: Christian Maggio has been outstanding as a right wingback in Napoli for a few seasons. He might play a bit further back at the national side, but he should cope well.
Valencia’s Jordi Alba looks like the first choice on left back, and as a former winger his offensive qualities are undisguised. Whether Alba, who is widely expected to join Barcelona this summer, has the necessary defensive qualities is another question.
Jon Walters will probably not start for Ireland, but the Stroke striker will probably be the impact guy from the bench. His physicality could cause problems for tired opponents, and Walters has had a decent season in Stoke.
Mario Mandžukić has been the stand-out performer for Wolfsburg this season with 12 goals and 8 assists. The tall striker is a great at holding up the play, possesses a decent technical ability and is a beast in the box






Will Croatia be dark horses or lambs to the slaughter?



Gav: Dark horses, definitely. They will get out of this group.





Keld, Denmark: Somewhere in between. I don’t see them going further than the quarter finals, but they could spring a surprise against one of the giants in this group.




Joao Diogo Reis: I don’t think that Croatia succeeding will be unexpected, in fact, that’s what I expect to happen. The question is more appropriate to Ireland: dark horses or lambs to the slaughter?





Dave Beattie: As indicated above I'm inclined to think lambs though the more I'm writing about this group the more doubts are creeping in.





Jon: Well it’s a little harsh to call a team who haven’t been out of the world’s top ten for a few years as either dark horses or lambs, even if they had to go through a playoff to get here! Croatia would’ve graced either Groups A or D and I’d have favoured them to qualify from either, here their fortunes depend upon how Prandelli’s playing ideal translates to tournament football and also whether they replicate their indifferent form from qualifying or if their more impressive displays from the playoffs against Turkey are more representative.





Michael: Dark horses. With full referential knowledge of Jon’s previous statement.







Just how thumped will Ireland be? (Or not, if you wish to argue otherwise)




Michael: Pirlo v McGeady, Richard Dunne v Jelavic and Llorente, Walters v Pique? Very!





Jon: Well 1994 shows that Ireland needn’t necessarily be thinking that it’s only a matter of how many they concede. Ireland’s secret weapon sits in the dugout though, with Trap being probably the finest manager at the tournament. With his attention to detail and ability to weld a team into more than the sum of its parts they may not go home with many points but neither are they likely to be thrashed. Look for a lot of tight games with Trap’s nous closing the undoubted skill gap between them and the other teams in the group.






Joao Diogo Reis: In theory they will lose the three games, but history says otherwise.





Dave Beattie: I'm inclined to think less thumped than Croatia but I could be very wrong.





Keld, Denmark: They will cause problems for every team, and the point they steal could decide this group.





Gav: No where near as thumped as I would like, but will ship at least 6 goals per game. :(





Pick of the group? (As above)




Gav: Spain vs Ireland. Ireland to concede 20 goals? Yes please!





Jon: For all Estonians, Spain dismantling the Irish. Given teams may simply try the method of defending deep and narrow against the Spanish and restricting opportunities as per the last World Cup I’m going for Italy-Croatia, which is also likely to be the crucial game in deciding who qualifies.





Michael: Italy/Croatia. Though its hard just to pick one. For those in the dark, Ireland enjoyed some dubious refereeing calls in their playoff with Estonia, where Gavin lives. To explain his slight upcoming schadenfreud .





Joao Diogo Reis: Italy vs. Croatia: In 2002 Croatia won this game but it was Italy that progressed from the group. This will be crucial in the fight for the second spot.





Dave Beattie: Pick of the group? Spain v Italy. After that it depends how the group develops. Italy v Ireland with both teams on 3 points would be fascinating. On the other hand if Croatia confound my uneducated expectations then they might well not need to be world beaters to upset Italy on matchday 2. I mean Slovakia - or at least their star players - disappointed me overall in 2010 & they still beat Italy...





Keld, Denmark: Ireland vs. Croatia in the first round. Both teams know that a win here will be immensely important for their chances to reach the quarters.





Who will qualify?





Dave Beattie: After all that, Spain and Italy.





Jon: As with Group B it seems a question of who accompanies Spain through. I’m saying Italy, just as I want to see as much of Balotelli as possible.




Michael: Spain and Italy





Gav: Spain and Croatia, quite easily.





Joao Diogo Reis: Spain and Croatia.





Alan Kalder: Qualifiers: Spain and Italy, but Croatia could sneak in! I'm looking for/hoping for big things from Fernando Llorente.





Keld, Denmark: Spain and Italy





Spain 7/7

Italy 5/7

Croatia 2/7

Ireland 0/7




That bonus question again. I like the random Stuff, and so do others.


Gav: Spain won the World Cup in 2010.



Keld, Denmark: Italy only let in 2 goals in qualifying.



Alan Kalder: Trivia: Fernando Llorente is known as "The Lion King." Athletic's nickname, of course, is "los leones."



Jon: No side’s ever won three major tournaments in a row and no-one’s ever retained the European Championships crown. Yet Spain qualified with eight wins from eight and the only answer anyone’s found to them is defending deep and narrow and relying on fortune favouring them…




And that is Group C.

Sunday, 3 June 2012

Euro 2012 roundtable #3: Group B preview



If you are late getting to the party, you can read about how we all felt Group A would work out here, and an introduction to proceedings here. And here is a story that people just seem to like. (Cheap plug!)





And given I have a healthy sense of self-depreciation, here are some of the best moments from my Euro 2008 preview. You could see it on the old blog, but I'd rather you didn't - that place is home to quite a lot of pretentiousness. I was younger!






"But to the neutral, a warning: any money spent on Spain is likely to be wasted, yet again.They wont win it. They'll get through this group, dazzle us all with some fine attacking play, and then capitulate to the runners up of the Group of Death. Its the Spanish way. "





"David Villa is likely to stay on the bench..."



"Now this may toy with your expectations of Euro 2008, but my mysterious sources (ie, magazines, experts and fans from Greece, yeah, I know my sources aren't all that mysterious after all) tell me that, faced with elimination in the Qualifiers, Otto Rehagal dropped his defensive tactics and opted for a attack minded offence, leading to Greece qualifying with easy and lots of goals. Now, will this change continue to the Euros? I have my doubts, but it would be nice to see some of this new Greek outlook." (Oh dear)



A wonderful bit where I point out Guus Hiddink's habit of taking teams to a Semifinal, then backtrack over Arshavins suspension and say Russia will finish 3rd in their group.




"Expect big things from Sweden"



"This called the group of death, and with good reason. However I am going to say - perhaps controversially - that there are, in my mind, 1 spot for 3. Because I cannot see Italy failing at the group stage. The Italians have a great record against Holland (havent lost to them since 1978, only lost twice in their history) and then take on Romania. It should be all done and dusted before France."



"Failure. With everything being so tight in this group, Holland are the only team who have proven they will probably fall to Romania. That, and France and Italy have far superior squads to the Dutch. Also, its a tight group: who cracks under pressure fastest? The Dutch." (Ok, I was actually right. It just happened AFTER the group stage)



France "will be semifinalists at worst".




Based on that, I have no idea why people listen to me. As bad as ITV. Oh well, hopefully I've gotten wiser in the subsequent four years!












Group B




"Anyone who bets against Germany in a tournament is a fool and an idiot."

Granda George.








Despite the best efforts of Sweden and Croatia to claim otherwise, Group B is the one with the Group of Death tag. Or the Group of Mortal Ceasing to Be Forever and Ever and Ever (until the World Cup qualifiers start in August). Three of the biggest nations in Europe, and three former European Champions. Those lists aren’t mutual, as Portugal has never won the Euros. And Denmark did, though they probably still don’t quite believe that one. Even if we were to exclude Denmark right from the off however, three into two don’t go.






The Group of Death often produces some lovely football. In 2002, we saw Englands narrow win over Argentina sandwiching the Argentine flurry against Sweden and Nigeria which produced four points and an early exit for a side showing the first glimpses of the impact Marcelo Bielsas footballing philosophy would have on the game. In 2004, everyones eyes were on Holland v Germany, only for the Czechs to astound the world with three straight group wins. Then, a limp German side fell home, and Rudi Voller got the axe. In 2006, Argentina and the Dutch narrowly beat a naive Ivory Coast, then easily beat Serbia Montenegro. In 2008, Holland took advantage of French disarray and the Italian habit of retreating in a conspiracys shell to take control of their group. Was there even a group of death at the last World Cup? Oh yes, Group G. Brazil won the group, Portugal bored us all to death outside thumping the minnows, and the Ivorians, cursing their luck for a second consecutive World Cup, narrowly crashed out.






In all of the Group of Deaths, we see a recurring trend. And no, not just Holland being in them. The underdog alternate at the bottom of the pile (Nigeria, Latvia, Serbia, Romania, North Korea) turns heads for a while, sometimes for the wrong reason, but never qualifies. With the exception of 2006, the team who does go out has never lost their opening match. Also, the team who luck out in the final standings need not get too worried about the future – all the others bounced back, and sometimes much better than they were before.










Thoughts on Germany?



"A wise man once said to judge a team on recent friendlies is a foolish errand."

Me in 2008, in a rare moment of sense.






Michael: I’ve never seen the point in disliking Germany. The Voller side was a bit dull, but effective, until it wasn’t. Then Klinsmann came in, and was slated all the way until the opening match of the 2006 World Cup. Do you remember some German fans fearing they’d crash out in the group stage? Some crash that was! Five straight wins was a run only ended by the eventual World Champions, Italy, in a glorious Semifinal. In 2008 they got to the final, though I’m not sure they hit the heights of 2006 in their run. Though the never say die attitude that got them past Turkey in the Semis was something to behold.






2010 put both of those in the shade though. The Germans were good. Very good. I am ashamed to admit I thought that being injury ridden and focusing on the kids, an early exit would happen. Those kids came ever so close to winning the whole tournament, dispatching the ego driven superstars of England and Argentina with exquisite football. Then they hit a roadblock called Carlos Puyol.






This was the same roadblock they met in 2008.






In 2012, we might see Germany v Spain for the third time in successive tournaments. The rule of three in movies suggests this time the Germans finally vanquish the unbeatable Spaniards. However, to do that, they have to qualify first!






They have a team oozing with quality though. My 2nd favourite player at the tournament, Thomas Muller, had a sensational World Cup, and so nearly won the Champions League in May, but for a bizarre substitution by his manager once he’d scored his goal. Miroslav Klose needs no introduction, he is simply one of the finest international strikers in football today. Even at the age of 33, I wouldn’t bet against him adding to his phenomenal tally, and he will surely aim to continue on to the World Cup where he is one goal off the record of Top Goalscorer in World Cup history. Schweinsteiger, the man who until May I had never seen miss a penalty. When he scores, Germany never loses. When Klose scores, Germany never lose either. Thats a wonderful psychological advantage to have.






They also have Mario Gomez, one of the most frustrating men in world football. If he scored half his chances, he’d be the greatest striker alive.






You could see goals from all over the pitch, another strength. The defence might not be as strong as it ought to be though.









Gav: Germany are quite good at football. I seem to remember tipping them as tournament winners (until I saw who was in the Czech Republic squad). They are a disciplined side and are better than England at taking penalties. What else can I tell you that Adrian Chiles probably already has a 100 times? Germany get an insular rating of 4. Not quite as insular as the Russians, but very close. Germany have Phillip Lahm who I love. He’s one of my favourite defenders and I’ve always wanted him in my Football Manager games but have never managed to sign him. How sad. They also have Ozil who was one of the standout players in the 2010 World Cup – it’s such a shame he went to Real Madrid. Still, he’s only 23, plenty of time to join Southampton at some point in his career.






I’m going to stick my neck out on the line and say that I think Germany will do well this year.








Jon: Things I like about not being English – I can quite happily admire the qualities of the Germans and enjoy. Schweinsteiger, Khedira, Kroos, Ozil, Lahm, Muller, Podolski… this is what a real golden generation looks like. It’s largely the same team as two years ago but two years older and wiser. The only question is have they closed the gap with Spain enough in two years? That they’ve only won one of their three matches so far this year is frankly irrelevant.








Keld, Denmark: A great team with immense depth in the offensive sector. Müller and Podolski can be replaced by creative players like Götze, Schürrle and Reus if Germany has any trouble in breaking up defences. They will probably try to adopt some of the Bayern München-forces in possession to become more than a predominantly counter-attacking team. The composition of the defence hasn’t been very stable; Philip Lahm is the only dead-certain starter, while Mats Hummels and Holger Badstuber have decent chances as well. The last spot is up for grabs, and this uncertainty combined with a Manuel Neuer, who has had some lapses of concentration in the past months, suggests potential defensive troubles against quality opponents, like the one’s waiting already in the group stage.








Joao Diogo Reis: Germany was great in the 2010 World Cup. Their starting XI two years later is pretty much the same. Their “reserves” are highly praised, although they have a lot to prove at this level. They are basically the Borussia Dortmund legion (Hummels, Schmelzer, Gotze, Sven Bender, etc.), players who won two German Leagues, but did nothing relevant at higher levels (Europa League and Champions League).
Based on expecting a lot from these players, the Germans think that they have a super squad. They may find out that their expectations were unreal.




Although Germany was fantastic in the 2010 World Cup, they lost two of their 3 games against European opposition – Serbia and Spain (and they defeated England). The other 4 wins were against Australia, Ghana, Argentina and Uruguay. 


The quality of their reserves isn’t the only problem. Who should be their striker, veteran Klose who may be past his best but has a fantastic record of 16 goals in 27 games at Euro or World Cups, or younger Gómez who has a great record at club football (12 goals in this Champions League edition) but never scored a goal for Germany in 8 games at Euro or World Cups?






Dave Beattie: Thoughts on Germany? Germany have been terrific to watch ever since Klinsmann had his stint in charge in 2006. Bit of an English-centric rant here but in 2000 Germany & England were equally awful. Germany might have been outrageously fortunate to reach the World Cup Final in 2002 - given that they were still fairly awful then - but since that their production of new young talent has been impressive to say the least. In England we still seem to be talking about the need to get the kids playing the right way at an ever younger age.










Thoughts on Holland?





Michael: I’ve never been a fan of Holland. I know, that’s practically a crime against football fandom, and the police will be around to send me to the Hague ASAP. But, for all the talk of the wonderful Total Football side, the Dutch side of my generation have been a bunch of grafters. They can play when they want to, but they had plenty of opportunities to do that in 2006 and 2010 and somehow managed to fail to live up to expectations. They always fail to live up to expectations. Even in 2008, when the entire world was waxing lyrically about the side, when all they’d done was use a sneaky tactic to catch Italy off guard, then thump a disinterested France. Against Romania they were pedestrian, and then they were out Total Football’d against the first team that tried playing them at their own game in Russia! They were a Euro 2008 footnote, spoken about at great length.



So, if they were to hammer a fragile Portugal and Denmark here, I’d expect the exact same praise. I feel a bit jealous of those who have 1970s and 80s Orange-tinted glasses, really. I wasn’t there, its all history to me. I go back and try and appreciate it, and come away going “Wow, Franz Beckenbauer invented Total Football, what a genius!” Or maybe I’m just contrarian like that.






They can be a nice side to watch when they feel like it though. Some of the football they produced against the French was admittedly very pretty, and against the Uruguayans and Italians in recent years they’ve shown lovely counter attacks. They were also one half of my favourite match ever, Holland v the Czech Republic at Euro 2004. A match I hear isn’t too popular in the Netherlands since Holland give up a 2-0 lead in it!






Here, I expect them to be a bit dour. The match against Denmark at the World Cup was a snooze, and though fiery, Germany/Holland could well be akin to the World Cup final.






They’ll get through, because they always seem to. They will probably get lots of credit for doing so. They might even meet Russia again in the Quarters. Don’t be surprised if they crash out much sooner than some expect, and in the usual cynical way.








Keld, Denmark: Will be interesting to see whether van Marwijk keeps the double lock with Mark van Bommel and Nigel de Jong, or whether he goes with a more creative player like Kevin Strootman or Rafael van der Vaart to partner one of them. Wesley Sneijder hasn’t been superb for the last two seasons and if he fails to hit the standard of the 2010 World Cup, Holland will hope that Robin Van Persie can continue his goal bonanza.








Joao Diogo Reis: Like Germany, Holland was also great in the 2010 World Cup. 6 wins in a row until they lost the final against Spain (Denmark, Japan, Cameroon, Slovakia, Brazil and Uruguay). They also had 9 wins in a row in Euro 2012 qualifiers, until they lost the last game against Sweden when they were already qualified. 





While Holland doesn’t have some of Germany’s problems, they have one big problem – the left back position. 


The only left back in their squad is 18 years old Willems. Bouma can also play there although he plays as central defender for PSV, Schaars is a left footed midfielder who may be adapted to play there… and there are also the possible adaptations of Heitinga or Boulahrouz. Too many doubts, Holland doesn’t have any more the security that Van Bronckhorst provided 2 years ago. 


They don’t have Germany’s striker problem (Van Persie and Huntelaar seem good enough, and there’s still Luuk De Jong as third choice), and their “reserve” is also reliable. 


Only 6 players in Holland squad never played in a major tournament: Krul, Willems, Vlaar, Strootman, Narsingh and Luuk De Jong.






Jon: The Dutch weren’t overly fancied by anyone to reach the World Cup 2010 final yet they did thanks mainly to Wesley Sneijder’s goals and much hard work from the likes of Van Bommel and Kuyt. The big question mark over them this time is their stamina – can the likes of Robben (after going all the way in the Champions League) and van der Vaart and an aging defence stand up to the rigours of tournament football? And will van Bommel’s inevitable slowing thanks to age mean he’s going to commit even more fouls which he’ll somehow escape punishment for? Plenty of goals at both ends of the pitch in their matches likely with a selection of forward players who’re the envy of probably every other competing nation.






Dave Beattie: Thoughts on Holland? Every instinct tells me that in a Holland-Germany head-to-head I should always root for the Dutch. But given how much I've enjoyed watching the Germans play in the past few years - at least when England aren't the other team - and the bitter taste left by the Dutch in the 2010 World Cup Final. Oh - & they were on the pitch in that awful game with Portugal in 2006 too...






Michael: Contrarian alert. I loved that 2006 game. 16 yellow cards, 4 reds, Figo headbutting folk, Ronaldo having to leave the pitch in tears after being hacked down, and in the middle of all that, a brilliant Maniche goal. Whats not to love? By the last five minutes, it was 6 attackers v 6 attackers, and I was desperate for extra time! The image of Deco and Von Bronckhorst, Barcelona buddies, sitting in the stands together having both been sent off, lives long in the mind too.










Gav: They wear orange. They’ll do well as usual, but don’t deserve it after their performance in the 2010 World Cup final. They are Chelsea to me.






Thoughts on Portugal?





Michael: No decent strikers, squad disharmony, a coach infamous for eccentric tactics, a star player who believes his own hype. If Portugal make it to the Quarterfinals, expect to see Mother Theresa reading the Six O’Clock news in the near future, as miracles have started happening.






Joao Diogo Reis: Portugal qualified for its 7th major tournament in a row. The last time that they missed one was the 1998 World Cup. In Europe, only Germany, Italy, Spain and France have been qualifying for more tournaments in a row. France’s last miss was the 1994 World Cup (9 in a row), Italy and Spain missed Euro 1992 (10 in a row), while Germany has been qualifying for every tournament since 1970 (22 in a row! Their last miss was Euro 1968, when it only had 4 teams). 


Unlike Germany and Holland, Portugal’s qualification was problematic. They only had 1 point after two games, where the coach was still Carlos Queiroz, but was suspended by the Portuguese Federation, so Agostinho Oliveira was the caretaker. After this bad start, a lot of things changed - new coach (Paulo Bento), some different players, and 5 wins in a row. Defeat against Denmark in the last group game forced Portugal to play a playoff, where they met Bosnia again (just like two years earlier in a World Cup playoff). Once again Portugal prevailed. 


Things haven’t changed from chaos to harmony with the new coach, though. Paulo Bento had problems with Bosingwa and Ricardo Carvalho, and none was included in the Euro 2012 squad. 


Like Holland, Portugal’s squad also has only 6 players who never played a major tournament: João Pereira, Miguel Lopes, Custódio, Rúben Micael, Varela and Nélson Oliveira.






Dave Beattie: Thoughts on Portugal? Portugal always seem to suffer from the lack of a real world class centre forward. On paper - with Ronaldo able to provide goals - they ought to be able to overcome this deficit but they always seem more like a talented bunch of individuals than a team to me.






Jon: I know football’s an eleven man game but I can’t enjoy any team which contains Ronaldo, the apotheosis of everything I dislike in a player. He’s one of the best in the world I grant you, but there’s a selfishness and arrogance to his game which is off-putting. And then they’ve got Nani, who’s undoubtedly talented but seems to spend more time working on his celebration than on his teamwork and I’m still to mention the most liked man in La Liga *cough* Pepe. Still, maybe this will be the tournament where they don’t play dead against good teams…






Keld, Denmark: The same old forward problems remain in Portugal, who will play one of Hélder Postiga, Hugo Almeida and Nélson Oliveira up front. Neither seems up to the job, so the Portugese will again put their goal-scoring faith in Christiano Ronaldo and Nani.










Gav: They have Ronaldo. Whenever I hear ITV football pundits talk about Ronaldo I think of this song - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLnWf1sQkjY&ob=av3n .






I am actually surprised that Paulo Bento has been brave enough to select any other strikers in the squad, presumably Ronaldo will see this as a bit of a snub?






Thoughts on Denmark?





Michael: Denmark is a lovely country. I’ve been there twice. One time, I was five and we went to Legoland. Which was brilliant. The second time, mum was at a conference, so me and dad spent the entire time eating Yorkies and telling each other ghost stories in the middle of Kobenhavn square. That was also brilliant. They also have laws designed to protect hedgehogs. Thats the kind of country I can’t help but root for: it’s a bit like a foreign Scotland!






(Last time I was there, they were also bloody expensive! But one can’t have it all!)






Danish Dynamite. They looked so good at the 1986 World Cup, then got thumped by Spain. They didn’t look so good in qualifying for the 1992 Euros. I’m being cruel, they finished a point behind Yugoslavia, but only the top team advanced so that was it. Then a little something called the breakup of Yugoslavia and the Balkan War happened. You may have heard of it. As a child of the time, the carnage and of Sarajevo is the first things I think of when I hear of the city. But here is not the place to go into the murky and many issues in that time period, bar one. Yugoslavia were disqualified from Euro 1992 as a result of the issues, and runners up Denmark invited to take their place. Many scoffed, Michael Laudrup in fact refused to return from his holidays for the tournament, which Denmark promptly won. Their 2-0 sensational win over Germany in the final sealed by Kim Vilfort, a man surrounded by tragedy: he had left the bedside of his dying daughter as she wanted to see him play in the final. Sniff. I think I have something in my eye.






Tragedy has stalked the Danish sides of recent memory: I think of Stig Tofting’s tragic early life, and of course, the poor manager, Olsen, who lost his wife several years ago when she fell overboard from a Germany to Denmark ferry.






Such events make a mockery of those who view “football isn;t a matter of life and death, its more serious than that” with a straight face. It also grounds the Danish side. This is not a country prone to egotistical huffs, they work with what they have. All for one and one for all, that even produces some nice flair at times.







Dave Beattie: Thoughts on Denmark? Denmark have largely slipped under my radar to be honest but the first line of WS's tactics section: "Olsen favours a flexible, attacking 4-3-3 system, with a view to using the wide players as much as possible" suggests they ought to be a team to watch. Shame they have such a tough draw.







Gav: Do I need to comment on Denmark? I guess it depends which Nicklas Bendtner turns up. If he hasn’t got his scoring boots on then Denmark will finish rock bottom of this group. If, however, the goal scoring Bendtner turns up then I can easily see Denmark finishing rock bottom with a goal to their name.







Jon: Along with Ireland the Danes must’ve been cursing the luck of their draw. Portugal again after they’d seen them off in qualifying and then the second and third place teams in the World Cup. But they’ve a lot to recommend them. There’s a solid spine to Morten Olsen’s team, despite long term first choice Sorenson being ruled out – Agger and Kjaer are one of the finest defensive pairings at the tournament, Kvist’s prospered in his step up to German football and ahead of him the is probably the most exciting Danish player since Michael Laudrup was in his prime, Christian Eriksen. If self belief equated to talent Nicklas Bendtner would dwarf the talents of Messi, Maradona and Pele combined but he’s good enough to do the job Olsen wants him to.






Joao Diogo Reis: Denmark qualified for 5 major tournaments in a row (1996-1998-2000-2002-2004), then they missed two (2006-2008), and now they’ve qualified for their second in a row (2010-2012).
They kept their coach Morten Olsen since the 2002 World Cup qualifiers. Many would have fired their coaches after failing to reach one or two final tournaments, or even for reaching it (in 2010) but not getting through the group stages. But not Denmark, they have a different way of doing things. 


People are talking about the “group of death” because of Germany, Holland and Portugal… but Denmark is quite big as well. They are the 10th in the Euro Cups all time table, only behind Germany, Holland, France, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Czech Republic, Russia and England. 


11 players of Denmark’s Euro 2012 squad never played a major tournament, while 8 only played one, the 2010 World Cup, where things didn’t went as expected. They reached the third game with 3 points (a defeat against Holland and a win against Cameroon), a win against Japan was necessary in order to progress. Instead they lost 1-3 and were eliminated – the first time that they couldn’t progress from a group stage in a World Cup. 



This time they’ll meet Holland again in the first game, but now the other opponents are Portugal and Germany, not Cameroon and Japan.






To try and top Group A, this time we have two Group B home perspectives. Step forward Keld:






Keld, Denmark: Our team should definitely be better than at the 2010 World Cup, but the opposition is dramatically stronger as well. The World Cup taught Morten Olsen an important lesson, which he has repeated several times: The players should be in match fitness. At the world cup several players had just returned from injury, but were pushed right into the starting line-up. So this time we should be fresher, younger, and more match fit. 


Old profiles like Jesper Grønkjær, Daniel Jensen, Martin Jørgensen, and Jon Dahl Tomasson all retired, or were omitted from the squad shortly after the World Cup. Especially the latter's retirement meant a quite significant change for the Danish Team. We kept the 4-2-3-1 system, but the change of personnel makes quite a difference. Instead of Tomasson, who was pretty much a second striker, Christian Eriksen, who is much more of a classic attacking midfielder, stepped into the side. The Ajax player has made Denmark better in possession, and more fluid up front. The downside, however, can be that Denmark lack players to support Bendtner in the box. 


Two other old players, Christian Poulsen and Thomas Sørensen, played a huge part of the Danish failure in South Africa with very obvious personal mistakes. The fans and the media demanded them out of the starting line-up, and Christian Poulsen was quickly replaced by William Kvist. Kvist quickly found into a great duo with Niki Zimling at the central midfield. Both players have a great stamina and can cover big spaces; Zimling adds a bit of attacking spark to the duo as well. 


Olsen, however, seemed to stick with Sørensen in goal despite his many injuries and his aura of uncertainty. So many Danes breathed a sigh of relief when Thomas Sørensen was injured in a recent friendly against Brazil; another game wherein he made a clear mistake. Hopefully Stephan Andersen or Anders Lindegaard can prove a safer last bastion. 


The Eriksen – Rommedahl – Bendtner trio was our most dangerous weapon throughout the qualification; Eriksen makes a pass behind the defence, Rommedahl outruns them and crossed for Bendtner. Seehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DY_N4CtL8PI#t=01m35s 

 
As Denmark is not expected to dominate the games, we could very well get the space to repeat this trick at Euro 12.










So, this group is a banker Danish victory, isn't it?





Gav: You said it...






Dave Beattie: Never say never...






Jon: Don’t write them off. They’ve already proven that they can match the Portugese, Olsen likes a possession based game and with key players from the German and Dutch sides liable to be suffering the rigours of a long club season (particularly those from Champions League finalists Bayern) they may well spring a surprise.






Keld, Denmark: Yes, the road seems quite clear for us. We will start out with the 0-0 draw against Holland that we would have gotten at the World Cup, had Simon Poulsen not inexplicably headed the ball into his own net. Then we will beat Portugal like we have done in our two last qualifications. And in our last match day, we can agree on a draw with a German side, which is already through. It’s as simple as that.






That’s the spirit!





Joao Diego Reis: Denmark’s problem is that Holland, Portugal and Germany are “improved” versions of Denmark. The football principles are the same, but it’s like playing chess and Morten Olsen is playing with pawns, while Low, Van Marwijk and Paulo Bento are playing with rooks, bishops and knights. (And that genius Paulo Bento gave up on one of his knights and opted for bringing a pawn instead). For Morten Olsen to win, being brilliant isn’t enough, he has to be brilliant and the others have to be really stupid.






I love hearing JDR’s opinions, as despite them being almost the complete opposite philosophy of mine, especially at the European football level, they are often full of interest and clever points. I suspect in this case, he has the nail firmly on the head, and with a nice analogy to boot. Though, speaking from a position of complete and utter bias, I hope Olsen is brilliant and the others are really stupid!









Players to watch out for?





Michael: Hugo Viana, once a punch line for Bobby Robson, had a wonderful season with Braga, so naturally the coach tried to axe him. Injuries twisted his hand, however, and Viana has his chance. Hummels impressed in Germany’s 5-3 defeat to Switzerland, and Marco Reus looks to be a useful threat. Jetro Willems has been flung in at the deep end for Holland, and how well they do may depend on how well he does. And after a solid season, if he gets any playing time, the young defender from Nordsjaelland, Okore. Well, I couldn’t just say Eriksen, could I?






Jon: The German and Dutch sides are essentially known qualities so no surprises here- Lahm won’t be playing his favoured right back role, but it’s always fun to see him marauding up the wing and Schweinsteiger will likely give his usual object lesson in controlling the game. For the Dutch the man worth keeping an eye on is Afellay – he’s had an injury wrecked season after his big move to Barca so his legs will be relatively fresh. Eriksen is touted as the next great Danish talent, but also Liverpool fans will tell you to watch out for Daniel Agger stepping gracefully forward with the ball out of defence. As for Portugal, anyone but the two wide attackers whose biggest love seems to be their own reflections!






Dave Beattie:
Germany: Key man - Ozil. New face to look out for: Mats Hummels - centre back from Champions Dortmund. 

Holland: Key man - Van Persie. Some interesting youngsters in the squad by the looks of things - especially left back Jetro Williams from PSV - who was in the U17s in 2011. Of all the youngsters though possibly Luuk de Jong of Twente has most chance of making an impact from the bench. 

Portugal: Boring to say but Ronaldo probably is the key man. It will be interesting to see if Nelson Oliveira of Benfica gets any playing time. 

Denmark: If Denmark are to surprise their new(ish) talent Christian Eriksen will probably be a name on the lips of the wider football audience by the end. I've always liked the look of Simon Kjaer in central defence but WS has Andreas Bjelland of new Champions Nordsjaelland - though sadly already off to Twente in the summer - as likely to play alongside Daniel Agger. Also interesting to see another Nordsjaelland defender - 19 year old Jores Okore - in the squad.






Joao Diego Reis: Hummels – the Borussia Dortmund player with the “easiest” access to the starting XI. He started 4 games in the qualifiers and although Germany won them all, they couldn’t get a single clean sheet.
Willems – All eyes will be on Holland’s left flank, their “weak spot”.
João Pereira – the pawn who is replacing the knight.
Krohn-Dehli – can a simple pawn be more effective than prima donnas like Cristiano Ronaldo, Robben & co.?






Gav: Look out for Ronaldo. Whenever he is on the ball mute your television set.






Keld, Denmark: Dortmund central defender Mats Hummels will be very important in the German defence. He is great with the ball at his feet, so he can break forward and start attacks against defensive sides.
I bet I’m not the only one who is excited to see Khalid Boulahrouz back in the Dutch starting line-up. The cannibal will probably start at left back; he will not provide many long forward runs, but his defensive abilities are strong.
Raul Meireles will be important for Portugal as the tenacious midfielder will be expected to combine a strong defensive showing with his characteristic forward runs.
William Kvist was named Danish Football Player of the Year in both 2010 and 2011, and the Stuttgart midfielder will be extremely important. As Denmark is not exactly expected to dominate possession in all games, he will have to deliver many interceptions and precise tackles in front of the defence. Furthermore some calm passing will be needed, so that Denmark will be able to keep hold of the ball in some periods of the games.






One of the big teams is going home (at least) - which is the most vulnerable?





Joao Diogo Reis: Germany is vulnerable because they overestimate the quality of their “reserve”, because Klose may be past his best and Gómez’s club form may not be repeated for the national team.
Holland is vulnerable in the left flank; actually their entire defense isn’t that impressive. Football is about attacking and defending, not only attacking.
Portugal is vulnerable because they don’t play as a team, because most of the players are too short, because Cristiano Ronaldo will monopolize all the free kicks trying to score a goal, instead of using them to cross the ball to his teammates.






Keld, Denmark: Well, Portugal is actually my least favoured team in this group; their defensive issues and lack of a credible striker will be too much to overcome.






Jon: No-one would’ve said the Germans… then they lost badly to Switzerland in a friendly on the weekend, albeit with a weakened side. Barring injuries depriving them of key players though they look the strongest side in the group and with two semi-final appearances in the last two World Cups to go with their runner-up spot in the last Euro Championship they have the experience and quality to negotiate a tricky group.



Sneijder, the key Dutch player from 2010, isn’t on form and if temperatures rise a few of the aging regulars could be found out by either pace or sides who force them to chase the ball. They have more goals in them than the Portugese though, and if in doubt in these situations always favour the team better equipped to score to do well.




Portugal somehow seem to equate to less than the sum of their parts at any major tournaments and though I’m not a fan of Ronaldo they’re foolish not to build their system around him – they’ve almost seemed designed to negate his obvious strengths at times and the Danes had him comfortably contained in the qualifying matches.










Gav: I’d say Portugal have the most chance of going home here.






Dave Beattie: The only team whose elimination would really shock me would be Germany.






Pick of the group? 





Michael: Germany/Denmark. A solid “whatever Denmark needs to KO Holland and Portugal” will ensure. Ahem.






Dave Beattie: I really don't know what to expect from this group but I fear that some of the most exciting games on paper might lead either to mutual suffocation and/or an increase in the number of cards per game average for the tournament - so I'm probably looking forward most to the games involving Denmark.






Gav:It has to be Portugal vs Netherlands. This one will be the decider for 2nd place. A lot at stake so Ronaldo will get sent off for retaliating when Nigel De Jong breaks his legs.






Jon: I’d love to say Germany-Portugal but fancy that the Portugese will be shyer and coyer than a teenage wallflower being asked out by the school hunk again. Instead my seat in front of the telly has long been reserved for one of the great grudge matches of international football, Germany-Holland.






Joao Diogo Reis: Germany vs. Portugal – if someone wins this game, the winner will be almost qualified to the quarter finals, while the loser will be in serious trouble (although still with a chance to recover)






Keld, Denmark: Netherlands vs. Germany in the second round.










Who will qualify?





Michael: Germany and Holland






Jon: Germany, and I’m going to go for the Danes to be the surprise quarter finalists with Eriksen demonstrating his talents. That’ll see them go home with no goals and no points now, guaranteed…










Gav: Germany and the orange Chelsea.






Alan Kalder: Qualifiers: Germany and Holland, but I'm rooting for Portugal, of course






Dave Beattie: Brave punt or serious wishful thinking only time will tell but... Germany & Denmark.






Keld, Denmark: Germany and Denmark.






Joao Diogo Reis: Portugal and Holland






Germany 6/7


Holland 4/7


Portugal 1/7


Denmark 3/7







Denmark have three times as many votes as Portugal! Of course, before anyone takes the Germany prediction to the bank, a word of warning: our solitary dissenter, Joao, is often right more than he is wrong. Which would be worrying for the Germans.





The Bonus question bit for Stuff People Ought to Know but Probably Don't.





Michael: I watched Germany v Switzerland. Stegen, the young goalkeeper, was at fault for all five goals. Goal.com still said he should go to the Euros. I said he’d be axed. I was right and they were wrong. *does smug dance*






Gav: A little known fact about Denmark – my brother lives there.






Jon: As I’ve alluded to already, the Danes should have a psychological edge having taken their qualifying group ahead of the Portuguese.






And despite my possibly harsh words earlier, there are actually some Portugese players I like. Honest!






Keld, Denmark: French club Evian is the biggest provider to the Danish national team squad with four players.






Joao Diogo Reis: Portugal was never eliminated in a Euro Cup group stage.
Holland was only eliminated in a group stage once; in 1980 (West Germany was in that group).
Germany was eliminated in a group stage thrice: 1984 (Portugal was in that group), 2000 (Portugal again) and 2004 (Holland was in that group)
Denmark was also eliminated in a group stage thrice: 1988 (West Germany was there), 1996 (Portugal was there) and 2000 (Holland was there).
So, whenever one of these teams fell in a group stage, there was always another of these teams present.



That is actually fascinating to my statistical mind.





And that is Group B.







On Monday, we shall look at Group C, which has my favourites to win the tournament in it.

Friday, 1 June 2012

Euro 2012 roundtable #2: Group A Preview




Euro 2012 Roundtable Episode 2

Group A Preview





Football football football football football football football.







I think that’s probably spoilers for what is ahead. In the last instalment, which can be found here, we talked about our hopes and fears and experiences. It was like Lord of the Rings, except shorter.




This time around, instead of qualification and that murky distance fiend known as The Future, we are focusing purely on Group A. And hopefully previewing it, though for the purposes I have enlisted some people who actually know what they are talking about, which is usually a bonus in these things. The ITV section will be carried out by yours truly. 




Who are we? Well, I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together. I’m Michael, I run this site. By run, I mean put random things up on blogger and try to feel important. This and many other innocent articles that are roughly like this one might contain several random plugs of my writing. Except right here, because I now feel pressurised to produce a great one. Ah well. 





Just kidding.



We also have Jon Arnold, writer, editor, football fan, music lover, the polymaths polymath. He casts his eye over the world game, and provides the literary parts of the discussion.



Gavin Mills lives in Estonia. He has a blog, which can be read here. Or would if I had a link to it on my hands. One will be edited onto the site later.



Gavin would like me to read out the following Disclaimer on his behalf

:

“I know nothing about world football. Pretty much all of the players that I will be mentioning will no doubt have played football in England.”


I wouldn’t worry. He’s sure to know more than ITV.



We are also delighted to see Dave Beattie, our Brian Glanville, back despite a busy schedule. His knowledge of the world game is second to few.



And, as always, we have a few European voices to add culture, understanding and perspective to proceedings.







Group A



Jon: Ah, Group A, the group of death… by boredom. Lots of good solid defences, not too many reliable goalscorers.



Michael: You might well think that. I couldn’t possible comment.





Thoughts on Poland as hosts?


Michael: I remember loving Polish football. It was 2004. They were in a World Cup qualifying group with England, Wales, the Northern Irish, Austria and Azerbaijan. Within this group, and ignoring the two England games, they were a joy to behold, as attacking football the likes of only the Czechs had shown me before swept everyone aside. They had two great matches with Austria, and thumped poor Azerbaijan 8-0 in a score line that flattered Azerbaijan. Thinking of it, Czech Republic v Poland in 2004 would have been the greatest event in the history of football. And thinking of how things developed from that point makes me so sad. Events within the England games, and the friendlies after, conspired to make the manager change his outlook. The attacking brilliance was shelved to make way for dour tactics. A disinteresting Poland lost to Ecuador in the World Cup and swiftly went home. They could have been so much more. They could have been a contender. Not for the Cup, perhaps, but for the hearts of men, like Nedved’s valiant Czechs had been. It was a personal watershed moment for the Poles, and they’ve not really recovered.. They had a unmemorable 2008 tournament, which finished with one point unfairly gained on the balance of play against co-hosts Austria: which itself wasn’t a patch on the 2004 game between the two nations.




But...do I get the inkling of things beginning to improve? In recent years (by recent, I might mean last year) Polish sides in Europe started to look more competitive. We saw Wisla and Legia both get to the last 32 in the Europa League this season (with Legia especially making me look a right fool as a pundit in the Playoff round!) and Lech did the same previously. Slask produced some nice performances before meeting the brick wall that was Rapid Bucharest in the final qualifying round before the group stage. They KO’d Scottish opposition, but looked good in the act anyway. And they’ve won the title, so will be in the Champions League coming up. So that’s 4 rising teams. This year sees a 5th, Ruch, whom I know little of, but have learnt by now to write off newer Polish sides in Europe at my peril. But to go from downbeatten to having four or five sides which can at least be competitive till Christmas in Europe is a worthy step forward.


We see this step forward in the national team too. Our one good keeper in 2008, Boruc, has been replaced by one better keeper in the Arsenal youngster. We have the Dortmund three, who are very good, and whose names I haven’t a chance of spelling correctly, let alone pronouncing. Amongst the lesser names, we notice the age average has gone down considerably, and they have a number of players playing in highly competitive leagues of high standard like the Bundesliga, Ligue 1 and the Russian league.



If we accept that facing higher standards every week will improve a player, then the number of Polish players increasing in these leagues, and the number of Polish sides starting to show up as permanent fixtures in Europe suggest that a proper Polish revival may be sooner than we might expect.



But what of 2012? Well, Poland might look weak. I wont say they look the weakest side in the tournament on paper, not just because its a fickle statement to make, but because they actually don’t even look the weakest side in their group on paper! A solid base to their side, and some interesting younger players, plus the advantage of playing at home and in a weaker group than the others, would give Poland more than a fighting chance of a tournament to remember.



The fear I have is that inexperience now will last long in the national psyche, and we wont see the Polish Summer recent history suggests is coming.





Dave Beattie: Thoughts on Poland as hosts? I used to think that not very good teams hosting tournaments would probably at least get out of their groups - but Belgium, Austria & Switzerland provide recent Euro proof otherwise. And South Africa on the World stage of course (nearly forgot!)... I hope I'm pleasantly surprised but if they do emerge from this group I guess it will have more to do with the paucity of the opposition than anything else.








Jon: It’s good to see the major tournaments taken to countries which aren’t traditional footballing giants – there’s far less chance of the public being as jaded as if the tournament went on a rotation of the bigger nations. Hopefully that’ll mean a cracking atmosphere for the tournament. In terms of the tournament though it’s distorted the draw somewhat, with tournament performances from Poland and Ukraine meaning they don’t really merit their status as top seeds and distorting the draw a little. Poland’s lack of competitive football over the last couple of years means that their FIFA world ranking position probably isn’t a true reflection of their real team ability, but their terrible World Cup 2010 qualifying campaign doesn’t indicate it’s that false a position. A lack of recent tournament pedigree doesn’t encourage much hope either – a fine qualifying campaign for Euro 2008 was followed by a dismal performance in the finals.



Equally that lack of competitive games means that it’s incredibly difficult to accurately judge Poland though. We simply don’t know how they’re going to play in a competitive game as it’s over two and a half years since their last one. Results over the last year in friendlies suggest a spark of hope, with Argentina beaten, Germany held and three wins out of their last four games but then defeats to France and Italy suggest that better teams may take advantage of them. Results also suggest a series of tight games with goals at a premium. Given the likely tight nature of matches in this group that means their weakness in defence may cost them with slow centre halves and Wawrzyniak not exactly being a prime consideration for the best left back in the tournament. Fortunately for them, what looks a weak group gives them every chance of progress to the knockout stages, particularly as they’ve got the best striker in the group.





Keld, Denmark: Since The Dortmund trio (Piszczek, Kuba and Lewandowski), along with Szczęsny in goal, stand out as the best players, I expect Poland to be a weaker and slightly more defensive version of Dortmund. In order for them to get the most of Lewandowski, it will be crucial that the three other front players, especially the attacking midfielder (probably Obraniak), manage to position themselves right in the fast-break situations. Those are probably Poland’s biggest chance of scoring, but another Dortmund-characteristic, the high pressing, could be a dangerous weapon as well, albeit applied less frequent than by the German champions. There seem to be quite some shortcomings elsewhere in the team. The defence, at least in central and left positions, look shaky, but maybe the French ‘acquisition’ Damien Perquis could solve some of those problems.





Joao Diogo Reis:
I think that Poland is the group’s weakest team, perhaps the tournament’s weakest team. And I don’t think that playing at home will change it. This is the European Championship, not the African Nations Cup. Equatorial Guinea and Gabon benefited from home advantage to progress from the group stages a few months ago, but in Euro 2008 being hosts hasn’t helped Austria or Switzerland. 



Poland has a great history in the World Cups, but their Euro Cups history is poor. They just qualified once, 4 years ago, and the results were weak (1 draw against Austria and 2 defeats against Germany and Croatia). Their recent results in World Cups aren’t impressive either – two group stage eliminations in 2002 and 2006, with two wins against the USA and Costa Rica, and 4 defeats against South Korea, Portugal, Ecuador and Germany. Perhaps Poland should ask for an invitation to play the Gold Cup. 




There aren’t many players left from their Euro 2008 squad. If none of them is dropped from the final squad, they should be just 5: Piszczek, Wasilewski, Wawrzyniak, Dudka and Murawski.





Gavin: Despite the scary Panorama documentary on the BBC I rather like Poland (the country). I’ve been through it a few times now and our stays have always been rather pleasant. What can I say about the team? They have Robert Lewandowski! I think he’ll be the player to watch for Poland – I mostly say this because he had a very successful career for me at Southampton in Football Manager. It’s a shame that Ebi Smolarek isn’t in the squad because he was also a great play for me in Football Manager!





Michael: I am delighted to say, in timely fashion, we have a Polish perspective!






Pawel, Gdansk: Well, Polish football hasn’t been admired since very long time ago. It is widely agreed among Poles that our team seems to be worse than virtually every other participant of the tournament. Except for Greece perhaps. Who knows their players? They have so long and strange names… And except for the Czech Republic as well. The Czechs used to be very good, but it has changed… And Russia? All right, Russia may be stronger than ourselves, but it is not always so that a favourite wins. And this is, I believe, a perfect line of common thoughts in Poland about our chances in the Euro 2012 tournament. 




The truth is our team is not as bad as our current position in the FIFA ranking shows, but definitely we cannot consider ourselves as the favourite of any duel we would be part of. However, by being assigned to the group that is commonly thought as a weak one a faint hope has arisen. Our players are able to play well. Unfortunately, they also are able to make simple mistakes. Especially the defence line has failed to prove their quality. It is difficult to believe that our performance in the back will be satisfactory. Therefore a remedy must be found in the attack. And maybe it will. This time, unlike before previous tournaments Poland qualified into (Euro 2008 and WC 2002, 2006), we have some players that are not anonymous in Europe. Especially two players from Borussia Dortmund – Łukasz Piszczek and Robert Lewandowski – have had a very good season in club competitions. It is interesting to notice that the current defender Piszczek used to be a forward a few years ago and is known for his ability to score goals. The goal scoring ability of Lewandowski is beyond any doubt. He is our biggest hope for achieving good results. The third one from Borussia – Jakub Błaszczykowski (I feel really sorry for non Polish TV reporters who will have to pronounce his name ) – is our playmaker. He is really a brilliant player who can also score. Adding a goalkeeper to the group (especially if it would be Arsenal’s Wojciech Szczęsny) and we have one very good player in every formation. The rest of the team seems to be shrouded in mystery. It is difficult to rely on them, however I can imagine them perform well. Unfortunately, I can also imagine the opposite case… 


There is also an interesting subject connected to players that are not considered as Polish players by quite a noticeable part of the society. There are five of them who learned how to play in France or Germany. As far as I know, two of them even don’t speak Polish. While Ludovic Obraniak seems to have become rather accepted, the other four players (Damien Perquis, Eugen Polanski, Sebastian Boenisch and Adam Matuszczyk) are contested by some fans. And the curious thing is that our coach, Franciszek Smuda, had objected to the habit of giving Polish citizenships to players from abroad. Shortly after accepting the job as the national coach, he changed his mind completely. Probably the reason was the lack of qualified players (especially defenders) among Polish candidates for the squad. 



And one last thing – how Poles feel themselves as the hosts of half of the tournament. First of all, we have built four good stadiums. Good and really beautiful ones. That is something new for our country. We have always admired stadiums in England, Germany, France…, and now we have some as well. We have built new roads – as much as probably never before in the past, alas much fewer than was promised by the government. This is why many people are disappointed. There were lots of different works done in many other areas – airports, railway, hotels, etc. Virtually, every single task was conducted in the name of Euro 2012. And even if not everything has finished successfully (especially renovating railway tracks), I really believe that we have made a big step in the right direction. Poland is now a different country that it used to be in 2007, when the decision of hosting the tournament was made. 



I also suspect that many Poles consider our country as the better half of the tournament. I am far from such thinking, however there is a question to consider why most of the teams that are to play in Ukraine have chosen Poland as a place to stay. The Ukrainians are not happy because of that, and I am also surprised. Perhaps it is a question of fans for which Poland may seem as a safer country than Ukraine? And probably it is cheaper and easier to get to Poland? But will the German fans go to Gdańsk, English fans go to Kraków and Portuguese fans go to Poznań to be close to their teams instead of going to see the matches? I don’t know. 


I have never been to Ukraine. For Poles it is much easier to go to Germany or any other EU country than to Ukraine, however it is not that hard to do it. There is a general thinking that Poland is more “European” and Ukraine is more “Soviet”. However, some of my friends, who went to Ukraine for holidays, were quite happy because of their trips and felt safe there. 



I personally think that those of football fans who will visit Poland during the tournament will discover Poland as an interesting place on the map of Europe. All of the four host cities belong to major Polish towns. All of them have a very long history and are full of interesting places. Not only historical ones (however their beauty is undisputable), but also restaurants, pubs, clubs, and other places where people can have good time. I hope that the Iron Curtain (the mental one that I believe still leaves Poland outside Europe in many people’s minds from the “old Europe”) will finally rust this year. 



As you can see, I am rather optimistic about the tournament in Poland. Frankly, it is difficult for me to wait almost two weeks for the beginning. I already feel a tension. I am going to see the match between Poland and Russia with my 11-years old son at the new stadium in Warsaw. Most of the other ones – probably in TV. Some of them, maybe in a fan’s zone in Gdańsk. I really believe, June will be a holiday for Poland.



Michael: Pawel is a long time reader of the forums on Bert Kassies’ site who signed up to send me this message. Bar a few minor alterations (changes of adverbs, etc) I have left it as it was. I believe I am right in saying that all of the European fans who speak in these blogs have English as a second language. I try to imagine communicating in Polish or Portuguese or Danish (or in Danish terms, remembering how bad I was actually trying it!) and am rather awed!



Thoughts on Greece?


Michael: I was told Greece had a new attacking mentality in 2008. Boy, was I fooled! I admit a bias against defense minded teams. I also admit that neither attack nor defence is necessarily a better way of playing the game, its just a personal preference of mine. I expect very much what I’ve come to expect from Greece: solid defence, a few counter attacks. Win a game. Competitive within the group.





Gav: Greece have been in the papers quite a lot in the past year or two. Not for football though, so I’m a little in the dark here. *glances at Wikipedia*. They were shock European champions in 2004. I remember that! Somehow I doubt they’ll manage to repeat that this year. *glances at Wikipedia squad list*. I’ve heard of Giorgos Samaras!





Dave Beattie: Thoughts on Greece? I still haven't forgiven them for beating the Czechs in 2004. They always seem so defensive in tournament play that I can't help rooting for their early elimination.





Jon: If ever a country needed a tournament to cheer them up it’s the Greeks. The country’s economically knackered, has an imposed leader and they’ve just had an election which represented a vote of no confidence in the entire political establishment. Feel good distraction then please Mr Santos.




Santos has so far continued Otto Rehhagel’s trick of getting the nation to punch above its weight via one of Europe’s meanest defences. Greece’s qualification for this tournament has to rank as their finest, two goals in the last ten minutes of the final qualification game meaning they finished qualification unbeaten and took the group ahead of Croatia, at the time pushing their FIFA ranking back up into the top ten. The law of the footballing gods of course states that such a qualifying campaign is liable to be followed by a deeply disappointing tournament, an impression reinforced by a poor tournament record outside their extraordinary Euro 2004, twelve matches producing only one win and one draw. As with previous tournaments, don’t expect a great deal of fluent attacking football – there were only 19 goals in the ten Greek qualifiers.





Keld, Denmark: I bet every football fan, and at least the Football Manager gamers, have been craving to see a Greek central defence with Papastathopoulos and Papadopoulos. And it’s not just name-wise that defence will be the focal point for Greece; I see no reason why Greece will depart from the cautious approach that won them the EURO 04. There is barely any world-beaters up front, so they have hope for one of the mediocre strikers to do a ‘Charisteas’ and play the best month of his life.





Michael’s Note: I can almost hear the Greek fans crying at the negativity on display here, so, in timely fashion:




Joao Diogo Reis: Greece is getting better. Controversial statement, but I’ll try to explain. In the past, Greece rarely qualified to the final tournaments. There was only Euro 1980 and the 1994 World Cup. Twice they were eliminated in the group stages, with only 1 draw and 5 defeats. Then there was Euro 2004. And after that, they started to qualify for most of the final tournaments. They still missed the 2006 World Cup, but now they qualified for 3 major tournaments in a row: 2008-2010-2012. In 2008 they still lost every game (Sweden, Russia and Spain), in 2010 they got their first non-Euro 2004 win (against Nigeria, payback for the 1994 World Cup), and now they have the chance to progress from the group stages for the first time since Euro 2004. 


They have good memories of Czech Republic, and although they lost against Russia, they also have good memories of being in a group with Russia. 


They have a very experienced squad: in their likely starting XI, everybody except left back Holebas has been to at least one major tournament with them. Panathinaikos’ midfield duo Katsouranis and Karagounis stand out, veterans from the Euro 2004 team who also played in 2008 and 2010.







Thoughts on the Czechs?


Michael: They were my favourite side in 2004. Alas, Nedved continued the streak which lead to the tragic hero in him, and hobbled off injured in the Semifinal. But for that, there seemed no stopping the inevitable Czech mate. (My S5 history teacher hated the use of the word inevitable. On the rare off chance he is reading this, he will be fuming!) In 2006, Czech magic seemed on the rise again, with a thumping 3-0 win over the USA. It was a false dawn, as they were soon “Out Czechs in 2004”’d by Ghana, and then comprehensively seen off by Italy. In 2008, it was Jekyll and Hyde. Dull in the opener which they won, then they produced two thrillers which they lost! What I learnt then was that against teams with defensive outlooks, the Czechs, lacking the skills of Poborsky and co, tend to sieze up. Against better attacking sides, they can counter attack and get stuck in and just enjoy themselves. So in a group full of attacking , enjoyable sides, the Czechs will be a lesser but as enjoyable side.



*looks up the teams in Group A*



Oh dear.



I can’t muster much expectation for the Czechs here. I saw them twice in qualification. They were so bad at times, they need to cheat to take four points off Scotland, and believe me, you have hit rock bottom if you need to do that to prosper against us. Had the Scots shown up against the Czechs then history would be different – Montenegro would be here now! Ho hum.



Greece have a smarter defence than us or Lithuania, the Poles have more hunger, and the Russians will tear them to shreds. I don’t see them picking up many points, though I don’t see them being embarrassed either.






Keld, Denmark: Well, they can still field an experienced foreign-based team, but their squad seems to lack depth as most of the back-ups are inexperienced domestic based players. I would really fear injuries, as several key players have proven injury-prone. Their midfield looks strong with Jiráček, Hübschman, Plašil and not least Rosický, but the defence and, barring a Milan Baros return to Euro 04 form, the attack does not look convincing.





Jon: In their relatively brief history the Czechs prompt fond memories from the Euros, reaching the final of Euro 96 in their first tournament and providing one of the all-time great Euro matches in 2004 when avenging a Euro 2000 defeat to the Dutch with a 3-2 win. And then of course, there’s the 1976 win before the split with Slovakia, including what’s officially the Greatest Penalty Of All Time from Panenka. Nedved, Baros Berger, Poborsky… great sides for a tournament they always seem more comfortable in than the World Cup. Sadly though, this isn’t a great side, a shadow of the imperious 2004 vintage which relied on a dubious decision against Scotland to make it through. Where do the goals come from? Baros is enduring a lean couple of years, Pekhart’s been deeply average in the Bundesliga and Lafata is a bully in the Czech leagues but still a small fish in the big oceanlike pond of international football. Cech can be a human roadblock – just ask Bayern or Barca - and there’s plenty of prettiness in midfield but you just can’t see where the goals are going to come from. Ultimately the key to the Czech’s fate would seem to be whether their fullbacks can provide the width to create enough chances.





Joao Diogo Reis: Unlike Greece, the Czech Republic is getting worse. Well, this is their 5th Euro Cup in a row, but they missed the 2010 World Cup, and in 2006 and 2008 they couldn’t progress from the group stages (win against hosts Switzerland followed by defeats against Portugal and Turkey in 2008, and also win against the USA followed by defeats against Ghana and Italy in 2006). 



Will this be the third consecutive final tournament where they win the first game and then lose the other two?
Well, if they win their first game against Russia (the group’s strongest team), they shouldn’t lose the following two. 




The Czech Republic had an easy qualifying path – not even close to group winner Spain, but good enough to finish ahead of Scotland, Lithuania and Liechtenstein, and then prevailed in a playoff against Montenegro.
Although they have more Euro 2004 survivors than Greece (Cech, Plasil, Rosicky and Baros), beside these 4, they only have 3 more players with experience at a major tournament (Sivok, Kadlec and Hubschman). From the rest of the team, stands out the Viktoria Plzen legion, who only recently is in the spotlight - they can use this tournament to be transferred to other teams, like Jiracek already did in December.






Dave Beattie: Oh - if only the Czechs had won in 2004 & all the other mid-ranking football nations had taken them as a benchmark for the future. But instead Greece won & so World Soccer's tactics headline for this new generation of Czech players is: "Defending in numbers while still getting forward to support the (lone) centre forward." Though on the positive side they have introduced a number of Plzen players into their squad recently & Plzen appeared - from their European adventures - to have some of the attacking vigour of the old Czech team of 2004 so maybe...






Gav: I rather liked these guys in Euro 2004. Mostly because at the time I really liked Milan Baros. It seems that 8 years later Baros is still in the squad, I like that. More importantly though, if my calculations are correct, this is the first squad to feature an ex-Saint in Nürnberg’s Tomas Pekhart. He joined Saints on loan from Tottenham for half a season. He didn’t make much of an impact (scored 1 goal) but he was great in Football Manager! With that wonderful strike partnership of Pekhart-Baros you can expect a lot of goals.



Thoughts on Russia?


Michael: How did they not make the World Cup?



Gavin: By failing to qualify.



Michael: Thanks. Russia dominated the playoff with Slovenia so much, that how they managed to conjure defeat from the jaws of victory I’ll never understand. It was positively Scottish. Combine that with Algeria’s win over an Egyptian side that ought to have made at least one World Cup at the bare minimum. Though England can thank their lucky stars: they nearly blew a group with USA, Algeria and Slovenia in it. Can you imagine how badly they’d have been thumped if the group opponents were USA, Egypt and Russia? Group of Death that never was.



Russia have always seemed a tournament away from dominating Europe. Always. I recently watched a marathon of Euros and World Cup highlights. For fun and research. The USSR/Russia/CIS produced brilliance, looked like world beaters, yet always came up short. Or sometimes, fell to pieces spectacularly. Yes, I’m looking at you, class of 1990. The World Cup squad of 1986 looked to have their hands on the trophy, then they met Belgium. Which, sorry Steve, will be the only Belgium reference in this piece.



Of course, back then we had Iron Curtains and Soviet National Anthems (sung in a barnyard nowhere near you this summer by Nikolai Volkoff) and Berlin Walls. That all came tumbling down.



Since then, Russia scored six goals in one game in a World Cup in 1994.



And here is their entire winning record in the World Cup finals of the 21st Century.



Beat Tunisia in 2002.



That’s all.



They were swiftly setting themselves up to be Europes largest underachievers – hey, Spain at least used to pretend to be a contender – and 2008 started barely differently. Thumped by Russia, narrowly beating Greece, and then came the far more impressive Sweden who were expected to get the required result. Instead Russia annihilated them, and then beat the Flying Dutchmen in a Quarterfinal far more one sided than one taken to extra time usually is. And given the sickening amount of platitudes by everyone who ever lived about the 2008 Dutch side on the basis of a jammy performance against Italy and performing well against a French side who would have lost to the Scottish under 5 poodles football team, Russia earned my entire gratitude for doing so! Then came a thumping by Spain. Did I just sense déjà vu?



Truth be told, Russia’s 2008 was two good performances out of five games, but perception counts for more. After all, the English 1990 World Cup is a glorious myth now, and all anyone remembers is Platts 120th minute goal, the Cameroon game and the West Germany semifinal! Not the earlier stages where they were “Doing a Greece”. Though to be fair, didn’t everyone in 1990? Except possibly the Germans and the Italians. Damn those Germans and Italians, forever trying to dispel carefully indoctrinated stereotypes about their football! Damn them!



But yes, perception is everything. Russia got to the Semis, which is no small feat, and produced a memorable night in their Dutch mastery. Which gave everyone hopes for 2010. When, instead of teaching the English a lesson in football the Magyars would have been jealous of, they were watching at home, after a playoff elimination. How very typical!



In this campaign, they managed to finish ahead of Trappatonis Ireland, a strong Armenian side, and a lacklustre Slovakia (despite their 1-0 win in Russia!). Russia/Ireland was like Barcelona/Chelsea, only Russia didn’t have Messi and Ireland didn’t have Torres, so it ended 0-0. Somehow.



Here, given their strength in comparison to the rest of the group, and taking into account, the law of averages of Groups of Death, they could easily see off the Dutch again and be in the Semifinals before sweating too much. Which would give us the strange benefit of having a side in the Semifinals and us not knowing their true potential. If things go to plan, Germany and Spain will meet in the other Semi, meaning Russia in a Semi would face Italy/Sweden/England. If they give it their all, theres nothing to say this wont be a tournament Russia will remember for a very, very long time. The cards have begun to stack in their favour.





Keld, Denmark: This slightly improved Zenit-team should be the best team in this group despite small reservations about their central defence. I hope to see the Zenit front five (Arshavin, Kerzhakov, Denisov, Shirokov and Zyryanov) + 1 (Dzagoev? Izmailov?) play the same fantastic fluid football that saw Zenit win the Russian league by a big margin.






Dave Beattie: Thoughts on Russia? I loved watching Russia in 2008 - & Zenit around the same time in Europe. They were my hot tip as an outside bet for the tournament back then due to "the Hiddink factor". I'm generally not as convinced by "the Advocaat factor" but since he was in charge of the Zenit side I enjoyed watching so much maybe I should give him more credit.






Jon: Russia – It’s Dick Advocaat, you know what you’re getting – 4-3-3. This Russia side isn’t likely to be as much fun to watch as in 2008, having based their qualification on a solid defence. Advocaat’s wisely based his central defensive platform around the CSKA Moscow trio of Akinfeev in goals and Ignashevich and Vasily Berezutsky in front of him. It gives the middle of the Russian defence a head start on other international teams where communication and style often has to be built on the hoof. In front of them the big question mark is the form of 2008 talisman Arshavin – since his first half season at the Emirates he’s not played well for a good three years. But with a defence as tight as Russia’s has been under Advocaat it only requires a moment of inspiration from the likes of Shirokov or Dzagoev to win a match. For a side strongly fancied they haven’t been particularly strong in warm-ups though – a 1-1 draw wioth Uruguay might be no disgrace but following it with a 0-0 against Lithuania isn’t great. I write this before the friendly against Italy which should be a better indication of how they might fare.




And one last question… can a manager the squad already know is off after the tournament maintain his authority over the tournament?



Michael’s note: Vasily Berezutsky has a hip injury and will miss the 2012 Euros. Which is a shame for Russia. Also an interesting note on Advocaat leaving after the tournament: he was due to do the same in 2004, and led Holland to the Semifinals. Will history repeat?




Joao Diogo Reis: Just like Greece and the Czech Republic, Russia only progressed from the group stages once in their last 3 major tournaments (2002-2004-2008 for Russia, 2004-2008-2010 for Greece, and 2004-2006-2008 for the Czech Republic. Poland never did it in 2002-2006-2008). 



But while Greece, Czech Republic and Poland’s “last impression” was of failure (at Euro 2008… or in Greece’s case, Euro 2008+2010 WC), Russia’s “last impression” was of success – Euro 2008 semifinalist.
They kept a big part of that team, but they have also “refreshed” the team with some interesting players.
They also have the advantage that a lot of their players play for the same club. For instance, their midfield trio (Denisov-Shirokov-Zyrianov) is Zenit’s midfield trio. There are many players from Zenit or CSKA Moscow, who are used to playing together.







Gav: My Russian neighbours. Without trying to mirror political/social standings, the Russians seem to be the most insular team of the group, with only 3 players plying their trade outside of Russia. I really liked Yuri Zhirkov in some tournament or other when Andrei Arshavin and Roman Pavlyuchenko were drawing a lot of attention. Zhirkov seemed to be the one that supplied the balls that gave Arshavin and Pav that high level of attention.



Michael’s Note – Some tournament or other was, I think, given the small clues Gav gives us, Euro 2008. Was that really four years ago? The calendar says yes.






Your player to pick from each?


Michael: I shall try not to be too obvious in here, though that leaves me open to looking very foolish. But then foolish is my natural state. SO here goes. Beyond the Dortmund lot and Brentford’s Hall of Famer, I recall that Rybus had looked good during Legia’s Europa League campaign. He now plays for Terek in Russia, is 22 and is mostly used as a substitute by Smuda, but could be one to watch if he comes on late. He’s also quite fiery, gave away some free kicks against Sporting I seem to recall. For Greece, Georgiadis isn’t coming, sadly, so watch out for him in future tournaments. That was my pick. Damn. There is not many unknowns in the Russian squad now, bar perhaps Dzagaev, but Izmailov might be lesser known. And for the Czechs, Darida. If he is good enough to chase veterans out of the final squad, he must be quite good.





Jon: Player to watch – An obvious one here, but so much depends on Robert Lewandowski. He’s the only Polish striker worthy of an international place and if he doesn’t fire then it’s tough to see where Poland are going to find goals from. Big weight on his shoulders but he’s been magnificent for Dortmund this season and the nerve he demonstrated in backheeling the decisive goal against Bayern shows that the focus of Poland’s hope may not be entirely misplaced. The Parma bound Ninis has missed a large chunk of the season, so whether he can bring his playmaking ability or if he’ll benefit from the fresh legs of not having played so many games is the real question – his finish to the season suggests he could be the spark that could see the Greeks through. (For the Czechs) Much as I hate to pick English league players, it’ll be Rosicky. He may not be a great goalscorer or even play the crucial pass that often but he’s capable of controlling a game from an advanced position and he’s a wonderful intelligent passer of the ball. Off the pitch Roman Shirokov’s lack of diplomacy is liable to be as entertaining as Mario Balotelli – on the pitch Russia will be hoping his good Champions League form carries over into the tournament. But I’m really looking forward to seeing Alan Dzagoev, who’s likely to be cutting in on the right side of the front three. He’s been around for a good few years now but is still only 21. He came within an inch of earning his team a draw against Germany on his debut, was praised by his manager… and still considered it a flop. He’s got high standards.



Joao Diogo Reis:

 Szczesny – Poland’s campaign depends on his performances. He must be extraordinary for Poland if they are going to do something in this tournament.
Holebas – the “new face” in Greece’s team, who hasn’t participated in the qualifiers.
Gebre Selassie – Other “new face”, the only player from the new Czech champion Slovan Liberec in their Euro 2012 squad- and with a name that doesn’t sound Czech at all. It’s the kind of name that you’d associate with a marathon champion, not with a Czech football player. His father is Ethiopian.
Dzagoev – Russia’s top scorer in the qualifiers, with 4 goals, he is only 21 years old, and this will be his first major tournament.



Michael: If the man we call Torn (hi Chris!) is reading this, he will appreciate all the praise of a man who will one day be in the Brentford FC Hall of Fame for his glittering half a season there, Szczesny. A one time Brentford loanee at a Euros? Whatever next!


Keld, Denmark:
Jakub Blaszczykowski has had a fantastic season in Dortmund, and made sure that the fans quickly forgot about Mario Götze’s injury. The right midfielder is strong despite his small size, and possesses a great, powerful shot from distance.
Sotiris Ninis has been the next big thing for several years, but he hasn’t impressed me on the international stage yet, so I instead look to the Greek goalie. Michalis Sifakis if fully fit, otherwise Alexandros Tzorvas, will have to deliver some great performances for the Greeks to go through. Something they have been lacking since Nikopolidis’ performance at Euro 04.
Rosický is the obvious choice and will be central after his great season in Arsenal, but you can’t go past a Czech player named Theodor Gebre Selassie. The Slovan Liberec player is set to start as right back, from where his incisive surges forward will be important.
Russia will need Roman Shirokov to complement Arshavin and Kerzhakov as a goal threat. He scored five times in this season’s Champions League, so he will know how to deliver on the biggest stage.
As an opening game, will Poland/Greece be as bad as Switzerland/Ukraine?



Dave Beattie:
Poland - Szczesny might have to be on hot form if Poland are to progress. From a more positive perspective if Poland are to be a force going forward: captain Blaszczykowski - if people don't just call him Blas they really should - appears crucial.

Greece - Sotiris Ninis seems to have been the next big thing in Greek football for many, many years now. At 22 it's time he delivered - injuries permitting at least.

Czech Republic - Another "injury permitting" pick here: Tomas Necid of CSKA Moscow. A very exciting attacking player from the bits & pieces I've seen of him playing for CSKA Moscow. If he isn't fit - AND the coach plays more than one striker for a sufficient amount of time a left field pick would be Tomas Pekhart - who was at Spurs for a while after doing well in the 2007 U20 World Cup (the Czechs reached the Final).

Russia - Arshavin has often disappointed at Arsenal but I still remember his performances in 2008 fondly. He could be the key man again assuming he's one of those players for whom the national shirt has recuperative powers. For a young emerging talent though: Alan Dzagoev of CSKA Moscow could be the one.









Gav: Player from each? Lewandowski, Samaras (thanks to my ignorance-o-meter), Pekhart and Zhirkov. Of those four I suggest you cheer Pekhart the loudest.



As an opening game, will Poland/Greece be as bad as Switzerland/Ukraine?


Gav: Is that a rhetorical question? I think this will be a good game. Poland will have the host power behind them and will beat Greece 3-1. You read it here first.






Michael: Now that’s the kind of glass half full optimism I like to see!





Joao Diogo Reis: Both teams should be cautious – it’s Greece’s style and Poland doesn’t have the quality or the audacity to play adventurous. Greece already defeated the hosts in an opening game once, they can do it again. Only this time, I don’t expect these two to meet again in the final. Well, I wasn’t expecting it in 2004 either.





Jon: Well it’s not the match the organizers would have chosen, but then the hosts being stuffed by the likes of France or Italy would’ve also been a damp squib to start.

 

Still, if it is that bad at least it’ll all be uphill from there!





Pick of the group? (The match you think will be must see of all of them)



Michael: Based on my mutterings above, Russia/Czechs!






Gav: The pick of this group has to be Czech Republic vs Poland. 6-2 to the Czechs.





Dave Beattie: Russia v Czech Republic - hopefully.





Joao Diogo Reis: Greece vs. Czech Republic – it will probably be the fight for the second spot.











Who will qualify?


Michael: Russia and Poland. I think Greece will run them close, and the Czechs will finish bottom, but have at least one point from their non-Russian games. 




Alan Kader: Russia and Czech Republic 

 



Joao Diogo Reis: Russia and Greece 





Dave Beattie: Who will qualify? Russia + the Czechs - hopefully playing some attractive stuff. I would be delighted if Poland can surprise me though. 

 



Gav: Czech Republic will top the group with ease. Their striker partnership of Pekhart-Baros will light up the tournament. 6 foot 4 ex-Saint Pekhart winning the ball for Baros. Expect lots of goals!


Michael: For those keeping score at home, the Czechs just lost to Hungary. World beaters.

Jon: This is the bit we come back after the group stages are over and wonder what the hell we were thinking isn’t it?





Michael: Almost certainly! 





Jon: Russia have solidity and potentially the goals to see themselves through so I’d plump for them to win the group, albeit unimpressively and for the Greeks to bore their opposition to death. Look for a few Lewandowski goals to take the Poles to an honourable third, not far off from qualifying.





Keld, Denmark: Russia and Poland





That makes it

Russia 6/7

Czechs 3/7

Poland 2/7

Greece 2/7





The Jon Arnold/Michael S. Collins Bonus Question for Thoughts on Their Qualification/Formations/Other Useful Stats People Might Want to Know?



Keld, Denmark: Łukasz Piszczek was in 2011/2012, according to whoscored.com, the best right back among the top five leagues.




Jon: I shall gloss over the Czech qualification campaign, mention of it may annoy the esteemed owner of this blog!




Michael: *mutter mutter sufferin’ succotash*




Jon: Suffice to say any verdict would feature the words ‘not’, ‘very’ and ‘impressive’, losing three of their games (though admittedly two were to the World and European champions). By contrast the other three teams qualified losing just one game between them (though admittedly Poland didn’t win any games to qualify either…). And yet a group with two qualifiers who lost one game between them is seen as weak and dull…




Michael: It’s because they’re too good for us, I think. This is clearly the Group of Win.




Jon: If Russia finish second in the group they’ll probably end up playing Germany in the second round on the anniversary of the day that the Second World War started for Russia. Vladimir Putin wants this to happen, so bank on it.




Michael: Politics on my page? Really? That must be a first.



Jon: *Paddington Bear stare*





Gav: Erm, did I mention Tomas Pekhart has played for Southampton? 



Michael: I don’t believe you did. 


Gav: Well, he played for Southampton. 


Michael: Cool. No Thistle players are at Euro 2012, though we did have the Faroe Islands goalkeeper at one point. *cries* 






And that does it for Group A.